Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomaterials: a forecast for the future

L L Hench1

  • 1Department of Materials, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK. l.hench@ic.ac.uk

Biomaterials
|October 30, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making behavioral technology transferable.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Thermal modeling of laser-densified microlenses.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Bioactive glass-induced osteoblast differentiation: a noninvasive spectroscopic study.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2007
Same author

Enhanced differentiation and mineralization of human fetal osteoblasts on PDLLA containing Bioglass composite films in the absence of osteogenic supplements.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2006
Same author

Discrimination between ricin and sulphur mustard toxicity in vitro using Raman spectroscopy.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2006
Same author

Preparation of bioactive glass-polyvinyl alcohol hybrid foams by the sol-gel method.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2006
Same journal

Remodeling TME via feedback-driven photothermal-ferroptosis-immune cascade.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Photodynamic therapy produces enhanced efficacy of antitumor immunotherapy by simultaneously inducing intratumoral release of sorafenib" [Biomaterials 2020, 240, 119845].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Mg-integrated octopus-inspired hydrogel dressing enables autonomous adhesion and wound closure for enhanced healing via sequential microenvironment regulation.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Engineering miRNA-223 nanocomplexes via bioorthogonal self-assembly for precision therapy of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Enhanced fluorescence imaging guided photodynamic therapy of sinoporphyrin sodium loaded graphene oxide" [Biomaterials 42 (2015) 16442].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

An injectable Ce-MnCo LDH nanozyme gel with cascade catalytic activity for acute radiation proctitis in rats.

Biomaterials·2026
See all related articles

Current prostheses last about 15 years. This research suggests focusing on tissue regeneration using bioactive scaffolds or resorbable materials instead of merely replacing tissues, promising longer-lasting implants.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Current bio-inert prostheses have a limited survivability half-life of approximately 15 years.
  • Bioactive materials offer improved device longevity but face mechanical limitations.
  • There is a need for advanced biomaterials that promote tissue repair over simple replacement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a shift in biomaterials research focus from replacement to regeneration.
  • To explore novel strategies for enhancing the longevity and integration of medical implants.
  • To present alternative approaches for activating in vivo tissue regeneration mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Investigating the use of hierarchical bioactive scaffolds for engineering in vitro cellular constructs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploring the application of resorbable bioactive particulates for in vivo tissue regeneration.
  • Examining porous bioactive networks to stimulate endogenous regenerative processes.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed methods aim to overcome the limitations of current prostheses by promoting native tissue integration.
    • Hierarchical scaffolds can be used to create living cellular constructs for transplantation.
    • Resorbable materials can activate the body's natural tissue repair mechanisms.

    Conclusions:

    • Biomaterials research should prioritize strategies that stimulate tissue regeneration rather than focusing solely on inert or bioactive material replacement.
    • Engineering living cellular constructs and utilizing resorbable bioactive materials are promising avenues for developing next-generation regenerative therapies.
    • This regenerative approach holds the potential to significantly extend the functional lifetime of medical devices and improve patient outcomes.