Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The validity of four bicycle ergometer tests

B Edgren, G Marklund, L O Nordesjo

    Medicine and Science in Sports
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Coalescence of Macroscopic Flux Ropes at the Subsolar Magnetopause: Magnetospheric Multiscale Observations.

    Physical review letters·2017
    Same author

    Magnetospheric Multiscale Satellites Observations of Parallel Electric Fields Associated with Magnetic Reconnection.

    Physical review letters·2016
    Same author

    Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
    Same author

    Psychophysical scaling: To describe relations or to uncover a law?

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
    Same author

    An index for breathlessness and leg fatigue.

    Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2009
    Same author

    A general scale to rate symptoms and feelings related to problems of ergonomic and organizational importance.

    Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia·2008

    This study compared four bicycle ergometer tests for physical fitness. Maximal work tests demonstrated the highest validity for predicting performance, guiding test selection based on practical factors.

    Area of Science:

    • Exercise Physiology
    • Sports Science
    • Physical Performance Testing

    Background:

    • Bicycle ergometers are widely used for physical work and performance testing.
    • Various testing protocols exist, each with potential strengths and limitations.
    • Selecting the most valid test is crucial for accurate physiological assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the validity of four common bicycle ergometer tests used in Sweden.
    • To determine which test provides the most accurate prediction of physical performance.
    • To offer guidance on selecting appropriate ergometer tests.

    Main Methods:

    • Four tests were evaluated: submaximal (for estimating maximal oxygen uptake), 6-minute maximal work test (Wmax6min), Cycling Strength and Endurance Test (CSET), and an individually adapted maximal test (IA-test).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Validity was assessed against cross-country run performance in military conscripts (aged 17-25).
  • Comparisons focused on the best prediction variable for each test.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in validity were found when comparing the best prediction variables across all four tests.
    • Validity coefficients ranged from .55 to .70.
    • Maximal work tests, including Wmax6min and IA-test, exhibited the highest validity coefficients.

    Conclusions:

    • All tested bicycle ergometer protocols showed moderate to good validity.
    • Maximal effort tests are recommended for higher predictive accuracy.
    • Test selection should consider specific research questions, practical constraints, and available resources.