Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis

P Joice1, G B Hanna, A Cuschieri

  • 1Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

Applied Ergonomics
|October 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of hospital volume upon clinical management and outcomes of esophageal achalasia: an English national population-based cohort study.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2018
Same author

Effects of intraoperative pyloric stretch procedure on outcomes after esophagectomy.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2018
Same author

Population-based cohort study of surgical myotomy and pneumatic dilatation as primary interventions for oesophageal achalasia.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same author

EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2018
Same author

Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on the long-term survival of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2017
Same author

Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same journal

Advancing safety training for nuclear decommissioning and dismantling: Integrating MX-based approaches for improved competency development.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Authority gradients in rail: A cross-jurisdictional systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The distracting role of stress: Impaired executive attention and delayed fatigue perception.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of work system components in interprofessional communication to determine shock etiology.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the impact of sopite syndrome on physiological responses during an immersive Augmented Reality (AR) game in a moving vehicle.

Applied ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

This study analyzed surgical errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using direct observation. Findings highlight the need for research into instrument design, training, and task differences to reduce surgical errors.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical error analysis
  • Human factors in surgery
  • Endoscopic surgery performance

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery is common, but surgical errors can occur.
  • Understanding error types and frequency is crucial for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To document the nature and incidence of surgical errors in laparoscopic surgery.
  • To guide future research and surgical training initiatives.
  • To assess the effectiveness of observational methods in studying surgical errors.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) approach was employed.
  • Direct observation was used to categorize and record errors.
  • The study focused on laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The observational methodology proved applicable and useful for assessing human error.
  • Specific areas requiring further research were identified, including instrument design and usage.
  • Differences in tasks and surgical training were noted as potential error contributors.

Conclusions:

  • Observational analysis is valuable for understanding surgical errors in laparoscopy.
  • Further research into performance shaping factors (PSFs) is needed.
  • Addressing instrument design, training, and task-related factors can help reduce surgical error rates.