Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Full-body interface pressure testing as a method for performance evaluation of clinical support surfaces

F Shelton1, R Barnett, E Meyer

  • 1Hill-Rom Co. Inc., Batesville, IN 47006, USA.

Applied Ergonomics
|October 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary

A new Pressure Index (P(index)) method accurately evaluates clinical support surfaces for reducing pressure ulcers. Low-airloss surfaces performed best, while standard innerspring mattresses performed worst in this study.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transition from stick-slip to continuous sliding in atomic friction: entering a new regime of ultralow friction.

Physical review letters·2004
Same author

Sex steroids and growth factors in the regulation of mammary gland proliferation, differentiation, and involution.

Steroids·2004
Same author

Quantification of GRB10 in 7p12-p14 by fluorogenic 5' nuclease chemistry and application for genetic diagnosis in Silver-Russell syndrome.

Annales de genetique·2004
Same author

[Quality assurance in intensive care medicine. SARI-surveillance on antibiotic use and bacterial resistance in intensive care units].

Der Anaesthesist·2004
Same author

Nosocomial outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis and investigation of ABO histo-blood group type in infected staff and patients.

The Journal of hospital infection·2004
Same author

Design of a surveillance system of antibiotic use and bacterial resistance in German intensive care units (SARI).

Infection·2003

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Pressure ulcers are a significant clinical problem, necessitating improved evaluation methods for support surfaces.
  • Current methods for assessing clinical support surfaces lack a comprehensive approach to pressure distribution analysis.
  • Designers require reliable tools to develop surfaces that effectively mitigate pressure ulcer incidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel Pressure Index (P(index)) for evaluating clinical support surface performance.
  • To integrate user representation and clinical simulation parameters into a single-value mean pressure index.
  • To assess the accuracy and repeatability of the developed mean pressure index in predicting surface efficacy.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Defined a Pressure Index (P(index)) based on analytical equations evaluating average, peak, and magnitude of interface pressures.
  • Incorporated subject representation and head-of-bed elevation parameters into the P(index) to create a mean pressure index.
  • Tested and compared three distinct support surfaces (innerspring, foam, low-airloss) using the developed evaluation method.
  • Main Results:

    • The mean pressure index demonstrated accuracy and reproducibility in evaluating the tested surfaces.
    • Low-airloss surfaces exhibited superior performance in pressure reduction compared to foam and innerspring mattresses.
    • Standard hospital innerspring mattresses showed the poorest performance in pressure reduction (p < 0.0001).

    Conclusions:

    • The developed mean pressure index is a valid and reproducible method for assessing clinical support surface performance.
    • This index provides a valuable tool for designers aiming to reduce pressure ulcer incidence.
    • The findings highlight significant performance differences among common clinical support surfaces, guiding material selection and design improvements.