Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visually perceived vertical and visually perceived horizontal are not orthogonal

G A Betts1, I S Curthoys

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Vision Research
|November 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skull Vibration Induced afternystagmus: A new clinical indicator of superior canal dehiscence.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Phase-locking of irregular Guinea pig primary vestibular afferents to high frequency (>250 Hz) sound and vibration" [Hear. Res. 373 (2019) 59-70].

Hearing research·2020
Same author

Phase-locking of irregular guinea pig primary vestibular afferents to high frequency (>250 Hz) sound and vibration.

Hearing research·2019
Same author

In vivo recording of the vestibular microphonic in mammals.

Hearing research·2017
Same author

New tests identify patterns of vestibular loss.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2017
Same author

Sensitivity of the cochlear nerve to acoustic and electrical stimulation months after a vestibular labyrinthectomy in guinea pigs.

Hearing research·2016

Perception of vertical and horizontal visual targets differs significantly with body tilt. These visual perception tasks are not orthogonal, impacting human spatial orientation research.

Area of Science:

  • Human spatial orientation
  • Vestibular system function
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • The human vestibular system, particularly the semicircular canals, plays a crucial role in maintaining balance and spatial orientation.
  • Understanding how visual perception interacts with vestibular input during body tilt is essential for fields like neuroscience and human factors.
  • Previous research often assumes visual perception of vertical and horizontal are orthogonal, a concept this study investigates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the difference in errors between visually perceived vertical (VPV) and visually perceived horizontal (VPH) tasks.
  • To determine if VPV and VPH are orthogonal under various body roll-tilt conditions and viewing distances.
  • To explore individual differences and repeatability in spatial orientation perception.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Eight subjects performed VPV and VPH tasks in a darkened room while positioned at various roll-tilt angles (0-90 degrees) around the naso-occipital axis.
  • Two viewing distances (25 cm and 60 cm) and two chair rotation speeds (2 degrees/s and 0.5 degrees/s) were employed.
  • A 1-minute delay was implemented at each tilt angle to allow for semicircular canal signal decay.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in average errors were found between VPV and VPH tasks at both viewing distances (P < 0.01).
  • Errors exhibited a complex pattern, with VPH having smaller errors at large roll-tilts and VPV at medium roll-tilts.
  • VPV and VPH were found to be non-orthogonal, with individual non-orthogonality reaching up to 7 degrees.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the assumption of orthogonality between VPV and VPH tasks under roll-tilt conditions.
  • Individual spatial orientation perception varies but demonstrates repeatable patterns.
  • The non-orthogonality suggests caution when comparing studies using VPV and VPH tasks, potentially influenced by somatosensory input and ocular counterrolling (OCR).