Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension: a 10-year follow-up study
R S Khattar1, R Senior, A Lahiri
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park, and St Mark's Hospital NHS Trust and Institute for Medical Research, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.
Insights
White-coat hypertension poses a lower cardiovascular disease risk than sustained mild hypertension. This study found white-coat hypertensives experienced fewer events and less organ damage.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- Differentiating between white-coat hypertension and sustained hypertension is crucial for risk assessment.
- Previous studies have yielded conflicting results on the long-term prognosis of white-coat hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cardiovascular disease risk associated with white-coat hypertension versus sustained mild hypertension.
- To identify predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with elevated clinic blood pressure.
Main Methods:
- 479 patients with elevated clinic systolic blood pressure (140-180 mm Hg) underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
- Patients were followed for a mean of 9.1 years for cardiovascular events.
- Subgroup analysis included echocardiography and carotid ultrasound to assess organ damage.
Main Results:
- White-coat hypertension (elevated clinic BP, normal ambulatory BP) was diagnosed in 126 patients.
- White-coat hypertensives were younger and had a significantly lower incidence of CVD events (1.32 vs. 2.56 events per 100 patient-years) compared to sustained hypertensives.
- White-coat hypertension was an independent predictor of fewer cardiovascular events (HR, 0.29; P=0.04), with less left ventricular and carotid hypertrophy observed.
Conclusions:
- White-coat hypertension is associated with a relatively benign prognosis compared to sustained mild hypertension.
- These findings support a less aggressive management approach for white-coat hypertension.
- Further research may clarify the optimal monitoring and treatment strategies for different hypertensive phenotypes.
Background:
The aim of this study was to compare the risk conferred by white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension for the development of cardiovascular disease.
Methods And Results:
Patients (n=479) who underwent 24-hour intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the basis of a persistently elevated clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg were followed up for the development of subsequent cardiovascular events during a 9.1+/-4. 2-year period. White-coat hypertension, defined as a clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg associated with a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, was present in 126 patients, and the remainder had sustained mild hypertension. A subgroup of patients without complications underwent follow-up echocardiography and carotid ultrasound. White-coat hypertensives were younger (44+/-12 versus 52+/-10 years, respectively; P<0.001) and had a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular events (1.32 versus 2.56 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; P<0.001) than sustained hypertensives. Multivariate analysis revealed age (P=0.002), sex (P=0.007), race (P=0.001), smoking (P=0.005), and the presence of white-coat hypertension (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.90; P=0.04) to be independent predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events. Subgroup analysis in patients without complications revealed a lower incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and lesser degrees of carotid hypertrophy in the white-coat group.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate a relatively benign outcome in white-coat hypertension compared with sustained mild hypertension.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications

