Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR safety at high magnetic fields

J F Schenck1

  • 1General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center, Schenectady, New York 12309, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|November 4, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety of strong, static magnetic fields.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2000
Same author

Very-high-field magnetic resonance imaging: instrumentation and safety issues.

Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI·1999
Same author

Dimensions of quality of life and self-monitoring therapy with oral anticoagulants--still research or everyday practice?

Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis·1999
Same author

Functional MRI of the lumbar spine in erect position in a superconducting open-configuration MR system: preliminary results.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·1998
Same author

Experience with MR-guided therapy.

Studies in health technology and informatics·1997
Same author

The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.

Medical physics·1996
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging uses strong magnetic fields, generally safe for patients due to weak tissue interaction. Ferromagnetic materials, however, pose significant risks and must be avoided.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Health Physics

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging employs magnetic fields significantly stronger than natural levels.
  • Understanding the safety profile of these intense fields is crucial for patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the health and safety risks associated with high-intensity magnetic fields used in MR imaging.
  • To identify potential hazards and protective measures in the MR environment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scientific literature on magnetic field interactions with biological tissues.
  • Analysis of safety data concerning MR imaging environments and ferromagnetic materials.

Main Results:

  • Diamagnetic interactions between human tissues and magnetic fields are weak, indicating a general safety margin.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ferromagnetic materials, whether as implants or contaminants, present substantial risks.
  • Mild, non-harmful sensory effects like vertigo may occur at very high field strengths.
  • Conclusions:

    • MR imaging magnetic fields are generally safe for patients under typical clinical conditions.
    • Strict avoidance of ferromagnetic materials is essential to mitigate significant safety risks.
    • Awareness of potential sensory effects at high fields is necessary for patient monitoring.