Therapeutic options and cost considerations in the treatment of ischemic heart disease
Related Experiment Videos
1University of Glasgow, UK. J.Cleland@biomed.gla.ac.uk
Insights
Medical treatment is the most cost-effective option for managing ischemic heart disease, especially for patients with well-controlled symptoms. Revascularization surgery offers benefits for intractable symptoms but is less cost-effective overall.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Clinical Decision-Making
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) presents significant mortality and morbidity challenges.
- Limited healthcare resources necessitate cost-effective treatment evaluations for IHD.
- Understanding the economic impact of IHD treatments is crucial for resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the costs and benefits of medical treatment versus revascularization for ischemic heart disease.
- To determine the most cost-effective strategy for managing IHD in a hypothetical patient cohort.
- To inform clinical decision-making regarding IHD interventions based on economic value.
Main Methods:
- A hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with ischemic heart disease was modeled.
- A spreadsheet model was developed using published data to assess costs and outcomes.
- Key outputs included annual health-service costs and quality-adjusted survival estimates.
Main Results:
- Medical therapy is the most cost-effective treatment for patients with well-controlled IHD symptoms.
- Revascularization surgery demonstrates high effectiveness and prognostic benefits for patients with intractable symptoms.
- Treatment costs below £5,000/QALY are considered highly cost-effective in the UK.
Conclusions:
- Medical treatment is the preferred cost-effective option for the majority of ischemic heart disease patients.
- The decision between medical therapy and revascularization should consider symptom severity and cost-effectiveness thresholds.
- This analysis supports prioritizing medical management for cost-effective ischemic heart disease care.
Abstract:
Ischemic heart disease is a serious health problem because it causes considerable mortality and morbidity. Given the limited resources for health care, it is important to establish the costs associated with the benefits of its various treatment options. We therefore assessed the costs and benefits of medical treatment versus revascularization in a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients. A spreadsheet model was constructed using published data. The main outputs of this model were health-service costs per year and quality-adjusted survival estimates. In the United Kingdom, costs for treatments of less than 5,000 Pounds/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) are perceived as highly cost effective, whereas those over 10,000 Pounds/QALY are considered expensive. For patients with intractable symptoms, surgery is highly effective and has benefits on prognosis. In patients with well-controlled symptoms on medical therapy, the benefits of surgery are small and uncertain, and therefore medical therapy is the most cost-effective treatment. Overall, the preferred cost-effective option favored medical treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and narrowing...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...