Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detection accuracy in chest radiography

J E Gray, K W Taylor, B B Hobbs

    AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
    |August 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Radiologist detection accuracy is not affected by focal spot size but decreases with increased image noise. Non-radiologists and radiologists respond similarly to noise variations in medical imaging.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Global advances and future directions in lung cancer care: expert consensus and strategic priorities.

    ESMO open·2026
    Same author

    Gene-specific expression and calcium activation of Arabidopsis thaliana phospholipase C isoforms.

    The New phytologist·2021
    Same author

    Sacituzumab govitecan, a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, for patients with epithelial cancer: final safety and efficacy results from the phase I/II IMMU-132-01 basket trial.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2021
    Same author

    Author Correction: Rice plants overexpressing OsEPF1 show reduced stomatal density and increased root cortical aerenchyma formation.

    Scientific reports·2019
    Same author

    Patient preferences of chemotherapy treatment options and tolerance of chemotherapy side effects in advanced stage lung cancer.

    BMC cancer·2019
    Same author

    Rice plants overexpressing OsEPF1 show reduced stomatal density and increased root cortical aerenchyma formation.

    Scientific reports·2019
    Same journal

    The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Image Quality Assessment

    Background:

    • Radiologist detection accuracy is crucial for medical decision-making.
    • The relationship between radiologist performance and medical image quality remains underexplored.
    • Image quality factors like focal spot size and noise significantly influence diagnostic outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of focal spot size and image noise on radiologist detection accuracy.
    • To compare the response of radiologists and non-radiologists to image noise.
    • To establish a clearer link between image quality parameters and diagnostic performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a thorax and lung phantom with simulated 6.4 mm lesions.
    • Employed a 183 cm source-to-image distance.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied focal spot sizes (0.3-2.0 mm) and root-mean-square (RMS) noise levels.

    • Main Results:

    • Detection accuracy was independent of focal spot size, but small focal spots increased false positives.
    • Increasing RMS noise decreased detection accuracy and increased false positives and intraobserver disagreement.
    • Both radiologists and non-radiologists exhibited similar responses to changes in image noise.

    Conclusions:

    • Focal spot size has a limited impact on detection accuracy but affects false positive rates.
    • Image noise is a critical factor that degrades detection accuracy and increases diagnostic uncertainty.
    • Image noise affects diagnostic performance consistently across radiologists and non-radiologists, highlighting its importance in image quality optimization.