Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mental incapacity: some proposals for legislative reform

J V McHale1

  • 1University of Manchester.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|November 4, 1998
PubMed
Summary

The law on treating mentally incapacitated adults, clarified by Re F in 1990, still has uncertainties. This paper examines proposed legal reforms addressing complex ethical dilemmas in this area.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental health law and the EU: the next new regulatory frontier?

Medical law review·2011
Same author

Law and clinical Research--from rights to regulation? An English perspective.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2005
Same author

Medical malpractice in England--current trends.

European journal of health law·2003
Same author

Health care contracts in Britain and the United States: a case for technology transfer?

Journal of nursing management·1995
Same author

Guidelines for medical research -- some ethical and legal problems.

Medical law review·1993

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Mental Incapacity Law

Background:

  • The House of Lords' decision in Re F (1990) provided some legal clarity on the treatment of mentally incapacitated adults.
  • Significant legal and ethical uncertainties persist regarding the management and treatment of individuals lacking mental capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore recent government proposals for reforming the law concerning the treatment of mentally incapacitated adults.
  • To analyze the ethical dilemmas inherent in proposed legal changes in this sensitive area.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the House of Lords decision in Re F (1990).
  • Analysis of proposals presented in a recent government green paper.
  • Discussion of ethical considerations related to mental incapacity and treatment.
Keywords:
Airedale NHS Trust v. BlandDeath and EuthanasiaHouse of Lords Select Committee on Medical EthicsLaw Commission (Great Britain)Legal ApproachMental Health TherapiesRe C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation)Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment)Who Decides? Making Decisions on Behalf of Mentally Incompetent Patients

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified remaining legal ambiguities post-Re F.
  • Outlined key ethical challenges within the proposed reforms.
  • Highlighted areas requiring further legal and ethical deliberation.

Conclusions:

  • The current legal framework requires significant reform to adequately address the treatment of mentally incapacitated adults.
  • Proposed legal changes necessitate careful ethical scrutiny to navigate complex dilemmas.
  • Further dialogue is essential to ensure patient welfare and uphold ethical standards in medical treatment decisions.