Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms

W B Harms1, D A Low, J W Wong

  • 1Washington University School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Medical Physics
|November 4, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute impact of aerobic exercise on local cutaneous thermal hyperaemia.

Microvascular research·2022
Same author

The effects of exercise training in the cold on cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular function in young healthy individuals.

Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical·2022
Same author

Oxynet: A collective intelligence that detects ventilatory thresholds in cardiopulmonary exercise tests.

European journal of sport science·2020
Same author

A mechanistic study of the tremor associated with epidural anaesthesia for intrapartum caesarean delivery.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2020
Same author

McSART: an iterative model-based, motion-compensated SART algorithm for CBCT reconstruction.

Physics in medicine and biology·2019
Same author

Body temperature, cutaneous heat loss and skin blood flow during epidural anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section.

Anaesthesia·2018
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new software tool for evaluating radiation therapy treatment planning (RTP) systems. It quantifies errors in dose distributions using a composite evaluation, improving accuracy over traditional methods.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Software Development

Background:

  • Current methods for evaluating radiation therapy treatment planning (RTP) systems, such as manual isodose curve superposition and point dose comparisons, have limitations in quantifying extensive dose data.
  • Sophisticated techniques like dose-difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) analyses exist but have sensitivities in specific dose gradient regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a software tool for the quantitative evaluation of computed dose distributions from modern RTP systems.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods by providing a more comprehensive error quantification approach.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a software tool integrating superimposed isodose plots, dose-difference, and DTA distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation of a 'composite evaluation' combining dose-difference and DTA criteria to identify discrepancies.
  • Utilizing a logical union of failing locations for both dose-difference and DTA analyses.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed software tool enables quantitative comparison of calculated and measured dose distributions.
    • The composite evaluation effectively identifies regions failing both dose-difference and DTA acceptance criteria.
    • The tool offers an efficient platform for physicists to assess RTP system accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • The composite evaluation method provides a robust approach for quantifying errors in radiation therapy dose distributions.
    • The software tool facilitates a more thorough and efficient assessment of modern RTP systems compared to conventional techniques.
    • This advancement supports improved quality assurance in radiation therapy planning.