Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry

P E Shrout1

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 1003, USA. shrout@psych.nyu.edu

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|November 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Psychiatric research reliability is crucial for accurate psychopathology ratings and diagnoses. This study discusses measurement theories and statistical methods for assessing reliability in psychiatric research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two plus two equals three? Do we need to rethink lifetime prevalence?

Psychological medicine·2009
Same author

Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of CONNECT: a measure of continuity of care in mental health services.

International journal of methods in psychiatric research·2007
Same author

Gender differences in the relationship of homelessness to symptom severity, substance abuse, and neuroleptic noncompliance in schizophrenia.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2001
Same author

Risk factors for homelessness among indigent urban adults with no history of psychotic illness: a case-control study.

American journal of public health·2000
Same author

Causal modeling of epidemiological data on psychiatric disorders.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·1998
Same author

Jews and their intraethnic vulnerability to affective disorders, fact or artifact? II: Evidence from a cohort study.

The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences·1997

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Psychometrics
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Psychiatric research relies on measurement theories of reliability for accurate psychopathology ratings and diagnoses.
  • Reliability and agreement statistics are frequently reported in empirical psychiatric studies.
  • Ongoing controversies exist regarding the optimal measurement of reliability and resource allocation for measurement quality in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss controversies in measuring reliability in psychiatric research.
  • To review recent theoretical and technical advancements in the statistical analysis of reliability.
  • To provide an updated perspective on reliability methods in psychiatric research since 1992.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of theoretical and technical contributions to reliability analysis.
  • Focus on statistical studies published after Kraemer's 1992 review.
  • Discussion of measurement theories and agreement statistics for psychopathology.

Main Results:

  • Reliability in psychiatric research remains a topic of debate.
  • Recent statistical advancements offer new approaches to assessing measurement quality.
  • Understanding and applying appropriate reliability statistics are essential for valid psychiatric research.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing controversies in reliability measurement is vital for advancing psychiatric research.
  • Continued attention to statistical methods enhances the quality of psychopathology ratings and diagnoses.
  • The study provides a contemporary overview of reliability in psychiatric research.

Related Experiment Videos