Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Operational terminology for stimulus exposure (SE) conditioning

G D Brown1

  • 1Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. glen@salk.edu

Behavioural Brain Research
|November 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary

This study proposes a new nomenclature for simple learning, introducing stimulus exposure (SE) conditioning. This framework clarifies operational terms for behavioral results, improving consistency in learning research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bacillus subtilis DE111 partially reverses endothelial dysfunction in western-diet fed mice.

Beneficial microbes·2024
Same author

Apolipoprotein E controls Dectin-1-dependent development of monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages upon pulmonary β-glucan-induced inflammatory adaptation.

Nature immunology·2024
Same author

Fungal-derived cues promote ocular autoimmunity through a Dectin-2/Card9-mediated mechanism.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2017
Same author

Fungal Recognition and Host Defense Mechanisms.

Microbiology spectrum·2017
Same author

CD4(+) T-cell survival in the GI tract requires dectin-1 during fungal infection.

Mucosal immunology·2015
Same author

Genomic interaction between ER and HMGB2 identifies DDX18 as a novel driver of endocrine resistance in breast cancer cells.

Oncogene·2014

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Learning and memory research
  • Animal behavior

Background:

  • Inconsistent terminology for simple learning processes (e.g., habituation, sensitization) hinders clear scientific communication.
  • A key issue is the conflation of operational definitions for behavioral results with theoretical constructs in learning.
  • Existing nomenclature lacks systematic clarity for basic conditioning paradigms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a systematic operational terminology for simple conditioning paradigms.
  • To introduce 'stimulus exposure (SE) conditioning' as a general category for learning through stimulus presentation without explicit contingencies.
  • To differentiate operational reporting from theoretical discussions in learning research.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Defined 'stimulus exposure (SE) conditioning' as learning via stimulus exposure, excluding inter-stimulus contingencies or instrumental reinforcement.
  • Categorized SE conditioning subtypes based on the number of stimuli, assessment methods, and stimulus-assessment relationships.
  • Classified learned responses as reduction, enhancement, or transformation.

    • Main Results:

    • Introduced specific SE conditioning subtypes: 'alteractive', 'iterative', 'heterostimic', and 'multistimic'.
    • Established a combined nomenclature, such as 'iterative reduction,' to describe specific learning outcomes (e.g., decreased response to repeated stimulus presentation).
    • Provided a framework for precise description of behavioral changes resulting from simple exposure learning.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed nomenclature offers a clear, operational language for describing simple learning phenomena.
    • This systematic approach enhances the consistency and reproducibility of behavioral research on learning.
    • Distinguishing operational terms from theoretical constructs facilitates more precise scientific discourse in learning and memory.