Related Experiment Videos
Initial clinical results of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy for pituitary
M Mitsumori1, D C Shrieve, E Alexander
1The Brain Tumor Center of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose:
To retrospectively evaluate the initial clinical results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for pituitary adenomas with regard to tumor and hormonal control and adverse effects of the treatment.
Subjects And Methods:
Forty-eight patients with pituitary adenoma who underwent SRS or SRT between September 1989 and September 1995 were analyzed. Of these, 18 received SRS and 30 received SRT. The median tumor volumes were 1.9 cm3 for SRS and 5.7 cm3 for SRT. Eleven of the SRS and 18 of the SRT patients were hormonally active at the time of the initial diagnosis. Four of the SRS and none of the SRT patients had a history of prior radiation therapy. Both SRS and SRT were performed using a dedicated stereotactic 6-MV linear accelerator (LINAC). The dose and normalization used for the SRS varied from 1000 cGy at 85% of the isodose line to 1500 cGy at 65% of the isodose line. For SRT patients, a total dose of 4500 cGy at 90% or 95% of the isodose line was delivered in 25 fractions of 180 cGy daily doses.
Results:
Disease control-The three year tumor control rate was 91.1% (100% for SRS and 85.3% for SRT). Normalization of the hormonal abnormality was achieved in 47% of the 48 patients (33% for SRS and 54% for SRT). The average time required for normalization was 8.5 months for SRS and 18 months for SRT. Adverse effects-The 3-year rate of freedom from central nervous system adverse effects was 89.7% (72.2% for SRS and 100% for SRT). Three patients who received SRS for a tumor in the cavernous sinus developed a ring enhancement in the temporal lobe as shown by follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Two of these cases were irreversible and were considered to be radiation necrosis. None of the 48 patients developed new neurocognitive or visual disorders attributable to the irradiation. The incidence of endocrinological adverse effects were similar in the two groups, resulting in 3-year rates of freedom from newly initiated hormonal replacement of 78.4% (77.1% for SRS and 79.9% for SRT).
Conclusion:
Considering the relatively high incidence of morbidity observed in the SRS group, we recommend SRT as the primary method of radiation therapy for pituitary tumors. When treating a lesion in the cavernous sinus with SRS, special attention should be paid to dose distribution in the adjacent brain parenchyma. Longer follow-up is necessary before drawing any conclusions about the advantages of these techniques over conventional external beam radiation therapy.