Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of dental midline position

J W Beyer1, S J Lindauer

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0566, USA.

Seminars in Orthodontics
|November 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary

The average acceptable maxillary dental midline deviation from the facial midline is 2.2 mm. Orthodontists and dentists are less tolerant of midline deviations than patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2014
Same author

Identification of genetic variation and haplotype structure of the canine ABCA4 gene for retinal disease association studies.

Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG·2010
Same author

Opinions of American and Swedish orthodontists about the role of erupting third molars as a cause of dental crowding.

The Angle orthodontist·2009
Same author

Moving an ankylosed central incisor using orthodontics, surgery and distraction osteogenesis.

The Angle orthodontist·2001
Same author

Condylar positional changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·1999
Same author

Asymmetries: diagnosis and treatment.

Seminars in orthodontics·1998

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Orthodontics
  • Facial Aesthetics

Background:

  • Maxillary midline position is crucial for orthodontic treatment planning.
  • Achieving perfect midline alignment can be challenging and complicated by other facial asymmetries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the aesthetic tolerance for maxillary dental midline deviation.
  • To assess the impact of various midline facial landmark positions on overall facial aesthetics.

Main Methods:

  • 120 participants (orthodontists, dentists, patients, parents) evaluated digitally altered images.
  • Participants rated dental midline deviation acceptability and landmark importance.

Main Results:

  • The mean acceptable maxillary dental midline deviation was 2.2 mm.
  • Orthodontists and dentists showed lower tolerance for deviations than patients.
  • Deviations in the maxillary midline and/or nose significantly reduced aesthetic appeal.

Conclusions:

  • Aesthetic guidelines for maxillary midline deviation are established.
  • Professional evaluations of midline aesthetics differ from patient perceptions.
  • Maxillary and nasal symmetry are key factors in perceived facial aesthetics.

Related Experiment Videos