Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Rescue echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis for cardiac perforation complicating catheter-based
T S Tsang1, W K Freeman, M E Barnes
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Insights
Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis is a safe and effective rescue strategy for cardiac tamponade following catheter procedures. This intervention successfully relieved tamponade in 99% of cases, often serving as the definitive treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Procedures
Background:
- Acute cardiac tamponade is an increasing complication of interventional catheterization.
- The efficacy and safety of echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis for this critical condition remain largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis as a primary rescue strategy.
- To assess patient outcomes, including complications and need for further interventions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 92 echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses in 88 patients with acute tamponade post-cardiac catheterization.
- Patients were often hemodynamically unstable, with 57% in frank hemodynamic collapse.
- Outcomes assessed included success rate, complication rate, need for surgery, and survival.
Main Results:
- Rescue pericardiocentesis was successful in 99% of cases, definitively treating 82%.
- Major complications occurred in 3% (pneumothorax, ventricular laceration) and minor in 2%, all successfully managed.
- 18% required further surgical intervention; no deaths were directly attributed to the pericardiocentesis procedure itself.
Conclusions:
- Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis is a safe and effective method for managing acute cardiac tamponade complicating invasive cardiac procedures.
- It serves as a definitive and often sole therapeutic intervention for most patients, reversing hemodynamic instability.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of rescue echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis as a primary strategy for the management of acute cardiac perforation and tamponade complicating catheter-based procedures.
Background:
In this era of interventional catheterization, acute tamponade from cardiac perforation as a complication is encountered more frequently. The safety and efficacy of echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis in this life-threatening situation and outcomes of patients managed by this technique are unknown.
Methods:
Of the 960 consecutive echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses performed at the Mayo Clinic (1979 to 1997), 92 (9.6%) were undertaken in 88 patients with acute tamponade that developed in association with a diagnostic or interventional catheter-based procedure. Most of the patients were hemodynamically unstable at the time of pericardiocentesis, with clinically overt tamponade in 40% and frank hemodynamic collapse (systolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg) in 57%. Clinical end points of interest were the success and complication rates of rescue pericardiocentesis and patient outcomes, including the need for other interventions, clinical and echocardiographic follow-up findings and survival.
Results:
Rescue pericardiocentesis was successful in relieving tamponade in 91 cases (99%) and was the only and definitive therapy in 82% of the cases. Major complications (3%) included pneumothorax (n=1), right ventricular laceration (n=1) and intercostal vessel injury with right ventricular laceration (n=1); all were treated successfully. Minor complications (2%) included a small pneumothorax and an instance of transient nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; all were resolved spontaneously. Further surgical intervention was performed in 16 patients (18%). No deaths resulted from the rescue pericardiocentesis procedure itself. Early death (<30 days) in this series was due to injuries from cardiac catheter-based procedures (n=3), perioperative complications (n=2) and underlying cardiac diseases (n=2). Clinical or echocardiographic follow-up for a minimum of 3 months or until death (if <3 months) for recurrent effusion or development of pericardial constriction was achieved in 87 (99%) of the patients.
Conclusions:
Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis was safe and effective for rescuing patients from tamponade and reversing hemodynamic instability complicating invasive cardiac catheter-based procedures. For most patients, this was the definitive and only therapy necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

