Emergency versus elective/urgent left ventricular assist device implantation

The risk and outcome in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on an emergency basis is still unclear.

Since April 1993, 40 patients received a Novacor and 8 patients a Heartmate LVAD in our institution. Patients with emergency LVAD placement were compared with the remainder in a retrospective manner. Parameters studied included underlying heart disease, preimplantation dysfunction of kidney, liver, lung, and cerebrum, interval of mechanical support, outcome, and complications.

Patients with emergency LVAD placement predominantly were seen with postcardiotomy heart failure (47%) or acute myocarditis (20%) (group A) whereas elective and urgent candidates for LVAD implantation mainly had dilative cardiomyopathy (67%) or ischemic heart disease (30%) (group B). The incidence of secondary organ failure was significantly higher for all organs in group A patients (p < .01). Mean support interval in patients who underwent emergency LVAD implantation was lower (74+/-79 days vs 115+/-80 days), and fewer patients could be forwarded to heart transplantation in this group (22% vs 78%, p < .01). Moreover, bleeding complications were increased in group A (66% vs 30%, p < .01), but not thromboembolism and infection.

In conclusion, the overall success rate after emergency LVAD implantation was lower, with bleeding being the most frequent complication. To achieve acceptable outcomes in disastrous situations, LVADs should be placed as early as possible.