Related Experiment Videos
[A 3-year experience with guided tissue regeneration procedures]
P Windisch1, G Kövesi, T Keglevich
1Semmelweis Orvostudományi Egyetem, Parodontologiai Klinika, Budapest.
Abstract:
The Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) procedures are promoting a clinically and radiologically as well as histologically verifiably periodontal attachment gain. The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these GTR techniques. In the past four years different barrier membranes (Gore-tex, Resolut and Guidor) were used around 318 teeth of 196 patients. 169 periodontal defects of 140 patients were followed up at least for two years. 54 patient had chronic adult type periodontitis, 67 suffered with rapidly progressing periodontitis and 15 had different severe mucogingival lesions. 111 vertical bony defects, 43 Class II-III furcation lesions and 15 mucogingival lesions were surgically corrected. The average preoperative probing depth (PD) and the clinical attachment loss (CAL) of the vertical bony defects were 5.3 +/- 1.7 mm and 6.2 +/- 1.9 mm respectively. The PD of the deepest Class III furcation lesion was 11 mm. The average gingival recession of the mucogingival lesions was 4.5 +/- 1.1 mm. The GTR technique provided the best results in the Class II-III furcation lesions, where an average 2.4 +/- 0.9 clinical attachment gain was observed one year postoperatively. The GTR techniques provided an average 1.8 +/- 1.2 mm attachment gain in the vertical bony crater cases. In both groups of cases a marked gingival recession followed the healing and the periodontal regeneration. In this way the average reduction in the probing depth exceeded the average attachment gain by more that 1.5 mm. 1 year after the operation the average radiologic bone fill was about 0.9-1.2 mm. The resorbable barrier membranes resulted in clinically significant root coverage and an average 3.5 +/- 1.7 mm gain in the width of keratinized gingiva. The success or failure of our cases were mainly determined by the patient's compliance, the level of the postoperative professional and individual oral hygiene and the number of periodontal recalls. These findings are also underlining the importance of the high standard of oral hygiene in the postoperative periodontal regeneration.