Related Experiment Videos
Mutagenic activity of topoisomerase I inhibitors
Hashimoto1, Chatterjee, Berger
1Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry, and Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4937, USA.
Abstract:
Topoisomerase I-directed agents are now in Phase I and II clinical trials and show great promise as potentially important agents for cancer chemotherapy. Because of their mechanism of action they may also be potential mutagens; however, their mutagenicity and oncogenicity still remain to be elucidated. We have previously shown that VP-16, a topoisomerase II-directed agent, induces sister chromatid exchanges and gene deletions and/or rearrangements in vitro. These observations may account for both the cytotoxic effects of topoisomerase II-directed agents as well as their recently reported leukemonogenic potential. To evaluate the potential mutagenicity of topoisomerase I-directed drugs, we measured mutant frequencies at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase locus of the V79 Chinese hamster fibroblast cell line treated with the topoisomerase I-directed drugs camptothecin and topotecan, and compared these results with mutant frequency obtained with the topoisomerase II-directed drug VP-16 and an alkylating agent, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). All of these drugs showed a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase locus. At a dose producing approximately 30% survival, VP-16, camptothecin, and topotecan induced mutant frequencies of 11.3 x 10(-6), 4.9 x 10(-6), and 2.7 x 10(-6), respectively, whereas the spontaneous mutant frequency at this locus was 0.3 x 10(-6). In contrast, the alkylating agent MNNG produced a mutant frequency of 562 x 10(-6) at 26% survival dose. The molar mutagenic potencies, expressed as mutant frequency/mol-h exposure, for VP-16, camptothecin, topotecan, and MNNG at approximately 30% survival dose were 0.9, 8.2, 2.3, and 56.8, respectively. On Southern blot analysis after EcoRI, PstI, or HindIII digestion, 6 of 12 independent thioguanine-resistant mutants induced by topotecan showed gene deletions or rearrangements. In contrast, five of five independent spontaneous mutants and six of six independent mutants induced by MNNG demonstrated the same restriction pattern as the parental V79 cells. These results indicate that the mutant frequency and the mutagenic potential of topoisomerase I and II active agents are quantitatively similar. The results further demonstrate that topoisomerase I and II active agents introduce mutations characterized by gene deletions and rearrangements, whereas spontaneous mutations and those induced by alkylating agents appeared to be more characteristically associated with point mutations. Thus, clinical use of the topoisomerase I and II active agents is expected to cause similar mutagenic effects that could potentially lead to secondary malignancies.
Insights
Topoisomerase I and II cancer drugs show similar mutagenic potential, causing gene deletions and rearrangements. This suggests a risk of secondary cancers with clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Toxicology
Background:
- Topoisomerase I inhibitors are promising cancer chemotherapy agents.
- Their mutagenicity and oncogenicity require elucidation.
- Topoisomerase II agents like VP-16 induce mutations and may cause leukemia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the mutagenicity of topoisomerase I-directed drugs (camptothecin, topotecan).
- To compare their mutagenic potential with topoisomerase II-directed drugs (VP-16) and alkylating agents (MNNG).
Main Methods:
- V79 Chinese hamster fibroblast cell line was used.
- Mutant frequencies at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase locus were measured.
- Southern blot analysis was performed on induced mutants.
Main Results:
- All tested drugs increased mutant frequency dose-dependently.
- Topoisomerase I and II agents induced similar mutant frequencies.
- Topoisomerase I and II agents primarily caused gene deletions/rearrangements, unlike MNNG and spontaneous mutations.
Conclusions:
- Topoisomerase I and II agents exhibit comparable mutagenic potential.
- These drugs induce mutations via gene deletions and rearrangements.
- Clinical use may lead to secondary malignancies due to mutagenic effects.