Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS)

H E Oria1, M K Moorehead

  • 1Department of Surgery, Spring Branch Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Obesity Surgery
|November 18, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of health status and quality of life after bariatric surgery: comparison of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.

Obesity surgery·2000
Same author

Performance standards in bariatric surgery.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·1999
Same author

Gastric banding for morbid obesity.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·1999
Same author

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of gallbladder disease in clinically severe obesity.

Obesity surgery·1998

A new scoring system, the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), standardizes bariatric surgery outcomes. It objectively evaluates weight loss, comorbidity improvement, and quality of life for better treatment comparison.

Area of Science:

  • Bariatric Surgery Outcomes Research
  • Obesity Treatment Evaluation
  • Medical Intervention Analysis

Background:

  • Lack of standardized outcome reporting hinders evaluation of severe obesity surgical treatments.
  • NIH Consensus Conference identified the need for standardized definitions of success and failure.
  • Comprehensive outcome analysis requires assessment of weight loss, comorbidity improvement, and quality of life (QOL).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a standardized system for reporting and comparing bariatric surgery outcomes.
  • To establish objective criteria for evaluating treatment success and failure.
  • To refine a scoring system for comprehensive outcome assessment.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of experienced bariatric surgeons informed the study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A scoring system, introduced in 1997, was further refined.
  • Psychologists recommended a disease-specific instrument for QOL assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) defines five outcome groups: failure, fair, good, very good, and excellent.
    • The system uses a scoring table evaluating excess weight loss, medical condition changes, and QOL.
    • A patient questionnaire assesses self-esteem and daily activities; complications and reoperations deduct points.

    Conclusions:

    • BAROS provides a simple, objective, and evidence-based method for analyzing bariatric surgery outcomes.
    • The system can be adapted for other obesity interventions and should be considered for international standardization.
    • BAROS facilitates comparison of surgical results and long-term effects versus nonoperative methods.