Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 27, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Optimal flexible designs in phase II clinical trials
1Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. tchen@helix.nih.gov
Abstract:
In the conduct of a phase II cancer clinical trial, patients usually enter in two stages. If the response rate from the first stage is low, then the study terminates. Within various two-stage designs, Simon proposed the optimal and minimax criteria. In the co-operative group setting, practical considerations make it difficult to arrive at the planned sample size exactly. Green and Dahlberg proposed and compared several flexible designs. In this paper, we explicitly define a flexible design as a collection of two-stage designs where the first stage size is in a set of consecutive values (n1, ..., nk) and the second stage size is also in another set of consecutive values (N1, ..., Nk), and each of k2 possible designs has the same probability of occurrence. We apply Simon's optimal and minimax criteria to flexible designs for phase II trials in order to minimize the number of patients tested on an ineffective drug.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
