Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Germ cell mutagenesis in Drosophila: multiple endpoint analysis

M J Nivard1, J Wijen, E W Vogel

  • 1Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis, Medical Genetics Centre South-West Netherlands, University of Leiden. nivard@rullf2.MedFac.LeidenUniv.nl

Acta Biochimica Polonica
|November 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary

This study classifies genotoxic alkylating agents (AAs) based on DNA damage mechanisms in Drosophila germ cells. Findings reveal structure-activity relationships linking chemical properties to carcinogenic potential, supporting Drosophila as a model for transgenerational damage studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The importance of distinct metabolites of N-nitrosodiethylamine for its in vivo mutagenic specificity.

Mutation research·2001
Same author

Genetic damage by bifunctional agents in repair-active pre-meiotic stages of Drosophila males.

Mutation research·2001
Same author

Phenotypes of Drosophila homologs of human XPF and XPG to chemically-induced DNA modifications.

Mutation research·2001
Same author

Parallel monitoring of mitotic recombination, clastogenicity and teratogenic effects in eye tissue of Drosophila.

Mutation research·2000
Same author

Induced mutagenic effects in the nucleotide excision repair deficient Drosophila mutant mus201(D1), expressing a truncated XPG protein.

Mutation research·2000
Same author

The in vivo genetic activity profile of the monofunctional nitrogen mustard 2-chloroethylamine differs drastically from its bifunctional counterpart mechlorethamine.

Carcinogenesis·2000

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Molecular Genetics
  • Carcinogenesis Research
  • Drosophila melanogaster as a Model Organism

Background:

  • Genotoxic carcinogens, particularly alkylating agents (AAs), induce DNA damage through various modifications.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of genetic damage from AAs is crucial for assessing carcinogenic risk.
  • Male germ cells in Drosophila provide a model system to study these genotoxic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of alkylating agents (AAs) in Drosophila male germ cells.
  • To correlate genotoxic activity with physico-chemical parameters and carcinogenic potency.
  • To validate Drosophila as a model for studying transgenerational genotoxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized genetic assays to quantify excision repair and clastogenic potency in post-meiotic male germ cells.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Determined germ-cell specificity by comparing mutagenic effectiveness across different cell stages.
  • Conducted molecular analyses to study the spectra of DNA adducts formed by selected AAs.
  • Employed a structure-activity relationship (SAR) approach to analyze genotoxic mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • Established clear SARs linking genotoxic activity in germ cells to physico-chemical parameters (s-values, O6/N7-alkylguanine adducts) and rodent carcinogenic potency.
    • Classified alkylating agents into five distinct groups based on their DNA modification mechanisms.
    • Observed significant similarities between molecular data from Drosophila and specific locus tests in male mice.
    • Identified aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) as a bulky-adduct forming agent within the classification.

    Conclusions:

    • Drosophila serves as a valuable model system for studying transgenerational genotoxicity due to conserved mechanisms with mammalian systems.
    • The identified SARs provide a framework for predicting the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of alkylating agents.
    • The classification of AAs based on DNA adducts aids in understanding their diverse genotoxic activities.