Related Experiment Videos
Low-level laser therapy in ankle sprains: a randomized clinical trial
R A de Bie1, H C de Vet, T F Lenssen
1Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|November 20, 1998
Summary
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) showed no significant benefit for lateral ankle sprains compared to placebo. Patients receiving placebo experienced better function and fewer relapses, indicating LLLT is not an effective treatment.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Rehabilitative Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Lateral ankle sprains are common injuries, often treated with standard regimens.
- Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is explored as an adjunct treatment for pain and healing.
- Evidence for LLLT efficacy in ankle sprains requires rigorous clinical evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose and low-dose LLLT versus placebo for acute lateral ankle sprains.
- To assess LLLT's impact on pain, function, and recovery time.
- To determine if LLLT offers benefits beyond a standardized treatment protocol.
Main Methods:
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 217 patients.
- Comparison of high-dose (5J/cm2), low-dose (0.5J/cm2), and placebo (0J/cm2) 904nm laser therapy.
- LLLT administered over 4 weeks as an adjunct to brace therapy and home exercises, with 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in pain reduction between LLLT groups and placebo.
- Placebo group showed significantly better function, reduced sick leave, and fewer daily activity hindrances.
- Low-dose LLLT group had a significantly higher rate of relapses at 1 year compared to high-dose and placebo groups.
Conclusions:
- Neither high-dose nor low-dose LLLT is effective for treating lateral ankle sprains.
- LLLT does not provide additional benefit when used with a standardized treatment regimen.
- Placebo treatment demonstrated superior outcomes in function and recovery compared to LLLT.