Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Central line exit sites: which dressing?

K Little1, D Palmer

  • 1Scarborough and North East Yorkshire Healthcare Trust.

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
|November 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prompt-directed ambient artificial intelligence for automated multidisciplinary tumor board documentation.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2026
Same author

GATA6 immunohistochemistry and prognosis after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from the ESPAC-4 trial.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

High-power test of a C-band linear accelerating structure with an RFSoC-based LLRF system.

The Review of scientific instruments·2025
Same author

HLA-E and NKG2A Mediate Resistance to BCG Immunotherapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Beyond the symptoms: Personalizing giant cell arteritis care through multidimensional patient reported outcome measure.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2023
Same author

Program logic of a mental health outreach service for socially anxious youth.

Evaluation and program planning·2023
Same journal

Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
See all related articles

A new transparent dressing for intravenous sites showed no difference in sepsis rates compared to standard dressings. Both dressing types have pros and cons, with cost potentially influencing the final choice for healthcare providers.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Infection Control
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Intravenous (IV) access sites require effective dressings to prevent infection.
  • Moisture retention in dressings can be a risk factor for complications.
  • Advancements include transparent, moisture-wicking IV dressings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of a new transparent, non-moisture-retaining IV dressing against a standard dressing.
  • To evaluate differences in sepsis rates between the two dressing types.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial was conducted.
  • Participants were assigned to either the new transparent dressing or a standard dressing group.
  • Sepsis rates were the primary outcome measure.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in sepsis rates was observed between the new transparent dressing group and the standard dressing group.
  • Both dressing types presented unique advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice.
  • No significant difference in complication rates was found.

Conclusions:

  • The new transparent IV dressing is comparable to standard dressings regarding sepsis prevention.
  • Clinical choice between dressings may depend on factors beyond infection rates, such as cost and specific patient needs.
  • Further economic analysis may be warranted.