Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisplatin in patients with cancer: analysis with the NONMEM
1Department of Biopharmaceutics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisplatin (CDDP) were evaluated based on a mixed-effect model using the NONMEM program. Unchanged CDDP in plasma was measured as a biologically active platinum species during CDDP chemotherapy, using high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma concentration measurements (157) of unchanged CDDP from 26 patients with cancer receiving 80 mg/m2 CDDP by infusion over 2 hours, 3.5 hours, or 4 hours were analyzed according to a one-compartment model. The influences of individual characteristics such as body weight, dose schedule, course, and clinical laboratory values (renal function markers, albumin) on total body clearance (Cl) and volume of distribution (Vd) were examined. In the final pharmacokinetic model, body surface area and dose schedule affected Cl of unchanged CDDP. The Cl of CDDP was increased by 27.3% after the 2-hour infusion schedule compared with Cl after the longer infusions. The Vd was estimated as 13.4 L/m2. The interindividual variability for Cl and Vd and residual variability were 22.9%, 30.9%, and 35.5%, respectively. The relationships between maximum concentration (Cmax) of unchanged CDDP and maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUNmax), or minimum creatinine clearance (ClCr,min) over a 1-month period after CDDP administration were evaluated according to linear, exponential, or maximum response (Emax) models. The linear or Emax model described pharmacodynamics most successfully, with relatively large interindividual variability for both slope and EC50 (more than 25%). Residual variability was 15.3% and 17.1% in BUNmax and Clcrmin, respectively. The population means and interindividual and residual variability of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CDDP were evaluated using the NONMEM program. The results of this study show that the population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approach could be useful to manage CDDP nephrotoxicity using sparse data in a clinical setting.
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Miscellaneous Pharmacokinetic Parameters
One key aspect of the noncompartmental approach is determining a drug's total clearance. This can be done by dividing the drug dose by the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity. The area under the concentration-time curve represents the drug's overall...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Nonlinearity can arise due to the saturation of plasma protein-binding or...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Role of Transporters
Polymorphisms occurring in drug transporters can alter...

