Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Denture Frame Analysis: an additional diagnostic tool

A G Celar1, J W Freudenthaler, R M Celar

  • 1Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Universität Wien, Austria.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|November 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2014
Same author

Accuracy of recording horizontal condylar inclination and Bennett angle with the Cadiax compact.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2002
Same author

Correlation between elevator muscle activity and direction of sagittal closing pathway during unilateral chewing.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2002
Same author

Overbite depth and anteroposterior dysplasia indicators: the relationship between occlusal and skeletal patterns using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2000
Same author

Mandibular position at chin-point guided closure, intercuspation and final deglutition in asymptomatic and temporomandibular dysfunction subjects.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2000
Same author

Cephalometric differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusions in 122 Europeans using the Denture Frame Analysis and standard measurements. Differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusion.

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·1999
Same journal

Very long-term (≥ 15 years) prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adult Herbst patients.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Failure rates of 958 interradicular mini-screws for maxillary total arch distalization following a well-established insertion protocol.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Compensatory characteristics and influencing factors of the sagittal curvature of the maxillary arch based on three-dimensional fusion imaging.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Glass ionomer open exposure and closed exposure of palatally displaced canines: a randomised controlled trial comparing postoperative pain perception and complications.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Shape variability and sexual dimorphism of the chin: a 3D geometric morphometric analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Powered vs. manual toothbrushes in fixed orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2026
See all related articles

The Denture Frame Analysis effectively distinguishes Caucasian malocclusion types using cephalometric analysis. This orthodontic tool evaluates skeletal and dental relationships, aiding treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Cephalometric analysis
  • Dental anthropology

Background:

  • The Denture Frame Analysis, a cephalometric method for lateral headfilms, was developed in Japan.
  • Current data on its application in Caucasian populations is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the Denture Frame Analysis in a Caucasian cohort.
  • To assess its ability to differentiate various malocclusion types.

Main Methods:

  • 106 Caucasian individuals were randomly selected and categorized into four malocclusion groups: Angle Classes I, II, III, and anterior open bite.
  • Statistical analysis was performed on measurements obtained from lateral headfilms using the Denture Frame Analysis.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant differences were observed among the malocclusion groups for most analyzed measurements.
  • The Denture Frame Analysis demonstrated its capability to differentiate between the various malocclusion types.
  • Skeletal and dental relationships were effectively evaluated by the analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The Denture Frame Analysis is a valuable tool for assessing Caucasian malocclusions.
  • It aids in defining orthodontic treatment goals and limitations by evaluating the occlusal plane and skeletal/dental relationships.