Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality in consumer-driven health systems

U E Reinhardt1

  • 1Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Economics, Princeton University, NJ 08644, USA. reinhard@wws.princeton.edu

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
|November 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health care for the aging baby boom: lessons from abroad.

The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association·2004
Same author

Can efficiency in health care be left to the market?

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2002
Same author

Perspectives on the pharmaceutical industry.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001
Same author

Professor Uwe E. Reinhardt. James Madison Professor of Political Economy at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2001
Same author

The defined-contribution paradox.

Health Forum journal·2001
Same author

Economists on academic medicine: elephants in a porcelain shop?

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001

The quality of health care experience, not just clinical quality, determines a health system's overall success. Confusing these can lead to sophisticated systems receiving poor patient satisfaction scores.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management
  • Patient Experience

Background:

  • The global healthcare sector prioritizes improving quality.
  • A critical distinction exists between clinical quality and the patient's overall healthcare experience.
  • The American healthcare system, despite its sophistication, faces challenges in patient-rated quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between clinical quality and the quality of the healthcare experience.
  • To analyze factors contributing to the American healthcare system's lower cross-national quality scores.
  • To offer insights for international policy regarding healthcare quality improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of distinct dimensions of the healthcare experience.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cross-national survey data on healthcare system quality ratings.
  • Examination of financial and managerial systems influencing quality improvement.

    • Main Results:

    • The American healthcare system's advanced clinical capabilities do not always translate to high overall patient experience scores.
    • Complex financial and managerial structures may inadvertently hinder quality improvement efforts.
    • International comparisons reveal a disconnect between technical sophistication and patient-perceived quality in the US.

    Conclusions:

    • Overall health system quality is primarily determined by the patient's experience, not solely clinical metrics.
    • The US experience highlights potential pitfalls in financial and managerial approaches to quality improvement.
    • Other nations can learn from the US to avoid similar challenges in healthcare quality.