Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing chance variability in treatment trials

H T Davies1

  • 1Department of Management, University of St Andrews.

Hospital Medicine (London, England : 1998)
|November 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A randomized comparative crossover study to assess the affect on circuit life of varying pre-dilution volume associated with CVVH and CVVHDF.

The International journal of artificial organs·2008
Same author

Improving care or professional advantage? What makes clinicians do audit and how well do they fare?

Health bulletin·2003
Same author

Introducing "ERIC", a living research ethics database.

Journal of medical ethics·2003
Same author

A rapidly expanding lesion in the neck: unusual presentation of Castleman's disease.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2001
Same author

How to present the findings of research.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2001
Same author

Exploring the pathology of quality failings: measuring quality is not the problem--changing it is.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2001

Chance variability can mislead clinical trial interpretations. P values and confidence intervals help avoid spurious findings and detect hidden effects in treatment studies.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Chance variability is a significant challenge in interpreting clinical trial results.
  • Misinterpretation can arise from both false positive (spurious) findings and false negative (hidden) effects.
  • Statistical significance testing is crucial for reliable interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain how chance variability impacts clinical trial interpretation.
  • To introduce statistical tools that mitigate misinterpretation.
  • To guide researchers in avoiding common pitfalls in data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the dual nature of chance variability in trials: producing spurious findings or masking real effects.
  • Explanation of the role of P values in assessing statistical significance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of confidence intervals for estimating the precision of treatment effects.

    • Main Results:

    • P values help quantify the probability that observed results are due to chance alone.
    • Confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values for the true treatment effect.
    • Both methods aid in distinguishing genuine treatment effects from random variation.

    Conclusions:

    • Proper use of P values and confidence intervals is essential for accurate clinical trial interpretation.
    • These statistical measures enhance the reliability of findings from treatment studies.
    • Adopting these tools minimizes the risk of making incorrect conclusions based on chance variability.