Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How fair is cataract prioritisation?

T Halliwell1

  • 1Wellington Hospital.

The New Zealand Medical Journal
|November 27, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cataract surgery prioritisation assessments show significant inconsistency between examiners, questioning their reliability. This variability impacts fair healthcare delivery and necessitates a review of current patient prioritisation methods.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Follow-up findings on aspiration cytology of amyloid from vitreous fluid.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2004
Same author

Aspiration cytodiagnosis of amyloid from vitreous fluid.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2002
Same author

Cytodiagnosis of Coats' disease from an ocular aspirate. A case report.

Acta cytologica·1993
Same journal

Reed diffusers: a potential cause of poisoning in young children in New Zealand.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Stuffy nights: elevated bedroom carbon dioxide concentrations indicate inadequate ventilation in Wellington homes.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Cautionary tale of how sodium polystyrene sulfonate caused gut necrosis: a case report.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Emergency lateral canthotomy and cantholysis for acute globe subluxation.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Liberation of an incarcerated tibialis posterior tendon following a posterior malleolar ankle fracture: a case report.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same journal

Implementing a cultural safety training plan across medical colleges in Aotearoa New Zealand-looking back, and looking forward.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Assessment

Background:

  • Effective prioritisation is crucial for managing surgical waiting lists.
  • Current methods for cataract surgery assessment lack standardized reliability.
  • Patient outcomes and healthcare equity depend on accurate prioritisation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of cataract prioritisation assessments.
  • To determine the consistency of priority scores assigned by different clinicians.
  • To assess the validity of current cataract surgery prioritisation tools.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-nine patients awaiting cataract surgery were assessed.
  • Two independent examiners used two distinct prioritisation forms each.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Priority scores were assigned and analysed for consistency between examiners.

    • Main Results:

    • Scores varied significantly between examiners, with differences up to 26 points (out of 100).
    • The study identified substantial inconsistencies in cataract prioritisation.
    • This highlights a lack of reliability in the current assessment process.

    Conclusions:

    • The current cataract prioritisation process is unreliable and its validity is questionable.
    • Rigid threshold scores for public sector surgery are inequitable and require review.
    • Prioritisation methods for other medical conditions should also be reassessed for validity.