Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation
1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Richland 99352, USA.
Abstract:
The research examined whether corrected misinformation influences anaphoric inferences people make during subsequent reading. Participants read a set of corrected-misinformation and no-misinformation stories and made judgments about probe words that were either appropriate or inappropriate anaphoric referents. At a short delay, the results showed less activation for appropriate referents that were corrections of misinformation. At longer delays, the activation of appropriate referents showed no significant difference, but misinformation probes were more quickly recognized than were inappropriate referents that were incidentally mentioned in control story versions. In all conditions, appropriate referents showed more activation than inappropriate ones. The results suggest that corrected misinformation can continue to influence on-line reading processes.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

