Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Corsi block-tapping task: methodological and theoretical considerations

D B Berch1, R Krikorian, E M Huha

  • 1National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 20892-7848, USA. berchd@drg.nih.gov

Brain and Cognition
|December 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex-Driven Differences in the Effectiveness of Individualized Clinical Management of Alzheimer's Disease Risk.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2022
Same author

Feasibility of Using a Wearable Biosensor Device in Patients at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2020
Same author

Fish Oil Supplementation Increases Event-Related Posterior Cingulate Activation in Older Adults with Subjective Memory Impairment.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2016
Same author

Standardization of needlestick injury and evaluation of a novel virus-inhibiting protective glove.

The Journal of hospital infection·2007
Same author

'What's his name?' A comparison of elderly participants' and undergraduate students' misnamings.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics·2004
Same author

The influence of learning style and cognitive ability on recall of names and faces in an older population.

The Journal of general psychology·2002
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The Corsi block-tapping task is vital in neuropsychological research but lacks standardized administration and scoring. This review examines its 25-year history, methodological variations, and cognitive underpinnings.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychological research
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Clinical assessment

Background:

  • The Corsi block-tapping task is a key nonverbal measure in neuropsychology.
  • Extensive use over 25 years highlights its importance.
  • Significant inconsistencies exist in its administration, scoring, and apparatus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey studies using the Corsi block-tapping task over the past 25 years.
  • To provide a detailed appraisal of methodological variations.
  • To critically examine the cognitive processes involved in task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of studies employing the Corsi block-tapping task.
  • Analysis of variations in task administration and scoring.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Historical contextualization of the Corsi task's development.
  • Critical evaluation of cognitive theories related to task performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified widespread methodological inconsistencies in Corsi block-tapping task implementation.
    • Documented a 25-year history of diverse study designs and apparatus variations.
    • Highlighted the need for standardization in research and clinical settings.
    • Provided a critical review of proposed cognitive mechanisms underlying performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The Corsi block-tapping task's utility is significant but hampered by methodological heterogeneity.
    • Standardization efforts are crucial for enhancing the reliability and validity of the Corsi task.
    • Further research is needed to clarify the precise cognitive operations involved.
    • This review offers a foundation for future research and clinical application of the Corsi task.