Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating quality management systems

L T Hetherington1

  • 1Department of Speech Communication, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA.

Journal of Nursing Care Quality
|December 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telling the story of quality: the use of storyboards in nursing units.

The Journal of nursing administration·1999
Same author

Becoming involved: the nurse leader's role in encouraging teamwork.

Nursing administration quarterly·1998
Same author

High tech meets high touch: telemedicine's contribution to patient wellness.

Nursing administration quarterly·1998
See all related articles

This study guides nurse administrators in evaluating quality management (QM) initiatives within healthcare systems. It offers practical advice on designing evaluations and reporting findings, emphasizing collaboration for robust results.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Administration
  • Quality Management
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Healthcare organizations increasingly implement quality management (QM) initiatives.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of these QM initiatives is crucial for continuous improvement.
  • Nurse administrators play a key role in overseeing and assessing QM programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework for nurse administrators to evaluate their quality management initiatives.
  • To offer practical guidance on designing and implementing QM evaluation plans.
  • To suggest methods for reporting QM evaluation results effectively.

Main Methods:

  • The study draws on the evaluation of a QM plan within a multiclinic healthcare system.
  • It outlines key considerations for designing an evaluation strategy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recommendations are provided for data collection and analysis in QM evaluations.

    • Main Results:

    • Effective QM evaluation requires a structured approach to design and implementation.
    • Clear reporting of evaluation results is essential for stakeholder understanding and action.
    • Collaboration with external partners, such as university researchers, can enhance evaluation rigor.

    Conclusions:

    • Nurse administrators can effectively evaluate QM initiatives by adopting a systematic approach.
    • Collaboration with academic institutions can strengthen the validity and impact of QM evaluations.
    • The findings provide a practical guide for improving healthcare quality through systematic assessment.