Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Human Genome Project after a decade: policy issues

J Burris1, R Cook-Deegan, B Alberts

  • 1Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA. jburris@mbl.edu

Nature Genetics
|December 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Anti-TNF-Experienced Patients with Crohn's Disease Initiating Vedolizumab Versus Ustekinumab.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2023
Same author

Height system connection between island and mainland using a hydrodynamic model: a case study connecting the Dutch Wadden islands to the Amsterdam ordnance datum (NAP).

Journal of geodesy·2019
Same author

Fostering reproducibility in industry-academia research.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2017
Same author

Airborne Raman lidar.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Temporal variations in the spectral output of a xenon fluoride excimer laser.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Measurement intercomparison of the JPL and GSFC stratospheric ozone lidar systems.

Applied optics·2010
Same journal

Mapping the path to clinical implementation of multi-omics.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Toward a framework for measuring the impact of ELSI research.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Mutational scanning reveals substrate-assisted autoregulation of the WNT destruction complex.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Spatial transcriptomic analyses highlight distinct erythroid niches in mice and humans.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Building up pangenome analysis block by block.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Mutations in splicing factor gene U2AF1 rescue defective oncogene splicing in KRAS-mutant cancers.

Nature genetics·2026
See all related articles

Two key 1988 reports from the National Research Council and Office of Technology Assessment guided the Human Genome Project. These foundational documents established a research blueprint, though they underestimated private investment and rapid scientific progress.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • The Human Genome Project (HGP) commenced approximately ten years prior to the reports discussed.
  • Early momentum for the HGP was significantly influenced by two pivotal reports released in 1988.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of foundational reports on the Human Genome Project's initiation and planning.
  • To evaluate the foresight of these reports regarding project scope, funding, and progress.

Main Methods:

  • Review of two key reports: National Research Council (NRC) report (February 1988) and Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) report (April 1988).
  • Analysis of the reports' influence on the joint plan by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Energy (DOE).
  • Assessment of how the reports informed Congress regarding NIH and DOE roles in genomics.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchDepartment of EnergyGenetics and ReproductionHuman Genome ProjectNIH-DOE Working Group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI)National Institutes of HealthNational Research CouncilOffice of Technology Assessment

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The NRC report endorsed the HGP, forming the basis for the NIH-DOE joint plan.
  • The OTA report provided Congress with tools to evaluate the roles of NIH and DOE.
  • Both reports underscored the significance of genomics and the necessity of a coordinated research effort.
  • The reports did not anticipate the substantial private funding or extensive patenting of genetic sequences.
  • The predicted rate of scientific progress was underestimated by the committees.

Conclusions:

  • The consensus-building efforts of the NRC and OTA committees were instrumental in establishing the HGP's foundational blueprint.
  • Despite underestimating private investment and the pace of discovery, the reports were crucial to the HGP's success.
  • The Human Genome Project stands as a major achievement in modern biological sciences, largely due to the strategic guidance provided by these early reports.