Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can children with language impairment be accurately identified using temporal processing measures? A simulation study

X Zhang1, J B Tomblin

  • 1The University of Iowa, Department of Speech and Pathology, Iowa City, 52242, USA. suyang-zhang@uiowa.edu

Brain and Language
|December 9, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mild hearing loss is a developmental risk: Response to Carew and colleagues.

Child: care, health and development·2018
Same author

A genome-wide sib-pair scan for quantitative language traits reveals linkage to chromosomes 10 and 13.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2015
Same author

Language and reading acquisition in children with and without cochlear implants.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
Same author

Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
Same author

Relationship between parenting behaviours and specific language impairment in children.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2001
Same author

Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

High predictive accuracy in language impairment studies may be inflated. Re-analysis suggests that large datasets with many variables can lead to overestimated accuracy for identifying language disorders.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Speech and Language Pathology

Background:

  • Previous research reported high predictive accuracy (98%) for temporal processing variables in identifying language impairment.
  • The original study by Tallal, Stark, and Mellits (1985) utilized a specific methodology that warrants further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the basis for the high predictive accuracy reported in identifying language impairment.
  • To re-evaluate the reliability of predictive models using large datasets and numerous variables.

Main Methods:

  • Three simulation experiments were conducted.
  • Stepwise discriminant analysis was employed using 160 arrays of random numbers to predict language status.
  • The impact of a large number of variables, each explaining minimal variance, on predictive accuracy was examined.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The re-analysis yielded an average accuracy rate of 86.3% in contrast to the original 98% for predicting language status.
  • A 95% accuracy rate was achievable with 160 variables, where each variable accounted for only approximately 1.5% of the language ability variance.

Conclusions:

  • The findings highlight the potential for inflated predictive accuracy when using large datasets to identify a small set of predictor variables.
  • Confirmatory studies are essential to validate findings derived from extensive data mining in language impairment research.