Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scientific thinking in ophthalmology

C Abraham1

  • 1chandran@md2.vsnl.net.in

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
|December 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review highlights the historical evolution of ophthalmology, emphasizing how clinical trials and scientific thinking have significantly improved patient care, despite technological advances often overshadowing these contributions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First evidence of legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the follicular fluid of a cohort of North Carolina in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

"Depth of the dorsal nerve of the clitoris: Implications for cosmetic and urogynecologic surgery."

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2022
Same author

"I realised it weren't about spending the money. It's about doing something together:" the role of money in a community empowerment initiative and the implications for health and wellbeing.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2020
Same author

Trial protocol: a clustered, randomised, longitudinal, type 2 translational trial of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm among adolescents in Australia.

BMC public health·2018
Same author

Erratum to "Brief interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections suitable for in-service use: A systematic review" [Prev. Med. 91 (2016) 364-382].

Preventive medicine·2016
Same author

The impact of interventions to promote healthier ready-to-eat meals (to eat in, to take away or to be delivered) sold by specific food outlets open to the general public: a systematic review.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2016
Same journal

Eye injury rates and community cost savings through vision centers: Evidence from southern India.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the protective efficiency of polycarbonate goggles against firecracker-related ocular injuries.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Clinical characteristics, risk factor analysis, and outcomes of graft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Issue regarding E Log book for PG students: Paper to pixels.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Methylation matters: A case control study on epigenetic alteration in diabetic retinopathy.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Understanding the disconnect: A pilot study of public perception versus reality of corneal donation in India.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical History
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Ophthalmology has a rich history influenced by science and medicine.
  • Recent technological advancements in ophthalmology are significant but often overshadow other crucial developments.
  • The impact of clinical trials on patient care is frequently underestimated by clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To trace the historical progression of science, medicine, and ophthalmology.
  • To underscore the importance of clinical trials in advancing patient care.
  • To illustrate the application of scientific thinking in clinical and academic ophthalmology.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of scientific and medical progress in ophthalmology.
  • Analysis of the impact of clinical trials on ophthalmological practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion on integrating scientific methodology into clinical and academic ophthalmology.
  • Main Results:

    • Ophthalmology's progress is a result of scientific inquiry and rigorous clinical trials.
    • Technological progress, while important, is complemented by evidence-based practice derived from trials.
    • Scientific thinking provides a framework for continuous improvement in ophthalmology.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical trials and scientific methodology are fundamental drivers of progress in ophthalmology.
    • A deeper appreciation for historical influences, including trials, is crucial for modern ophthalmological practice.
    • Applying scientific thinking enhances both clinical outcomes and academic research in ophthalmology.