A non-randomized comparison of two radiotherapy protocols in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

We report an audit of two different telebrachytherapy schedules in inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus. Between October 1990 and December 1996, 108 patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 50 were selected from our database on the basis of intention to treat by telebrachytherapy. Teletherapy in the low dose group L (55 patients) consisted of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, while that in the high dose group H (53 patients) consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The choice of teletherapy dose was based on physician preference. The high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy that followed 2 weeks later was identical in both groups and consisted of two applications of 6 Gy, a week apart. The pretreatment disease characteristics of the patients in both arms were similar. Relief of dysphagia was obtained in 49% of the patients in group L and in 75% of those in group H (chi2: P = 0.004). The median dysphagia-free interval was 0 and 7 months in groups L and H respectively (log-rank: P = 0.06), while the median overall survival was identical at 8 months (log-rank: P = 0.21) for both groups. The probability of survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 34.8% versus 35.8%, 14.5% versus 13.9% and 0% versus 10% for groups L and H respectively. Morbidity in the form of ulcers, strictures and fistulae were observed in 9%, 7% and 5% of patients in group L compared with 8%, 8% and 13% in groups H respectively. This audit suggests that the protocol used in group H, when compared with group L, results in a greater proportion of patients being rendered dysphagia free, with a statistical trend towards a greater sustainment of dysphagia relief on follow-up.