Related Experiment Videos
Multiple arterial grafts. Radial versus right internal thoracic arteries
M A Borger1, G Cohen, K J Buth
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Circulation
|December 16, 1998
Summary
Using two arterial grafts in coronary bypass surgery (CABG) is safe and reduces perioperative cardiac events compared to one graft. Radial artery (RA) grafts are associated with fewer sternal infections and lower transfusion needs than right internal thoracic artery (RITA) grafts.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Vascular Grafting
Background:
- Left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) demonstrate superior patency and long-term outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- The advantages of employing multiple arterial grafts and the comparative performance of different arterial conduits remain subjects of ongoing debate.
- This study addresses the controversy by comparing single versus multiple arterial grafts and evaluating the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) against the radial artery (RA) as a second arterial conduit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare perioperative and intermediate-term outcomes between patients receiving one versus two arterial grafts during CABG.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a radial artery (RA) compared to a right internal thoracic artery (RITA) as the second arterial graft.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from isolated CABG patients between 1989 and 1996.
- Comparison of outcomes for single arterial graft (LITA to LAD) versus double arterial grafts (LITA + RA or LITA + RITA).
- Sub-analysis comparing RITA versus RA as the second arterial graft for patients undergoing double arterial grafting since 1992.
Main Results:
- Single arterial grafting was associated with a significantly increased incidence of perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality (OR 2.2).
- Double arterial grafting showed a trend towards improved intermediate-term survival and cardiac event-free survival, though not statistically significant.
- Radial artery (RA) grafts, compared to RITA grafts, were associated with a shorter intensive care unit stay, but a higher incidence of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and elderly age in the patient cohort. RITA grafts had a higher rate of sternal wound infection and blood product transfusion.
Conclusions:
- The utilization of two arterial grafts in CABG is safe and effectively reduces perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality compared to single arterial grafts.
- When used as a second arterial graft, the radial artery (RA) demonstrates a lower incidence of sternal wound infection and reduced transfusion requirements compared to the right internal thoracic artery (RITA).
- There were no significant differences in perioperative or intermediate-term cardiac morbidity or mortality rates between RITA and RA grafts.