Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998

G J Christensen1

  • 1Clinical Research Associates, Provo, Utah 84604, USA.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|December 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Class II resin restorations, or composite fillings, are now viable for posterior teeth due to material and technique advancements. Increased education and acceptance are needed to integrate these modern dental restorations into mainstream U.S. dentistry.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retentive characteristics of dental cementation materials.

General dentistry·2012
Same author

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements.

British dental journal·2005
Same author

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.

British dental journal·2005
Same author

Contemporary dental practice in the UK: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching.

British dental journal·2004
Same author

Treating the potential problem patient.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2002
Same author

Dental continuing education in the aftermath of Sept. 11.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2002

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Restorative Dentistry

Background:

  • Class II resin restorations have faced acceptance challenges in American dentistry for three decades, largely due to historical stigma associated with early composite materials.
  • Despite past issues, contemporary composite resins for posterior tooth restorations now possess physical properties that support their clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for the broader acceptance and integration of Class II resin restorations into standard U.S. dental practice.
  • To highlight the advancements in composite resin materials and placement techniques, addressing historical reservations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the evolution of Class II resin restoration materials and techniques over the past 30 years.
  • Comparative analysis of the challenges and benefits of composite resin restorations versus traditional amalgam restorations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of current clinical techniques and their learnability for dental professionals.

    • Main Results:

    • Current composite resins for posterior restorations demonstrate physical characteristics suitable for clinical use.
    • Techniques for Class II resin placement have significantly improved, making them manageable for dentists and students.
    • Both composite resin and amalgam materials and techniques present unique clinical challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • It is time to embrace Class II resin restorations in U.S. dentistry.
    • Enhancing education for dentists and students regarding Class II resin restorations is crucial.
    • Increased acceptance by third-party payers and regulatory bodies is necessary for mainstream adoption.