Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Working in a moving environment

A H Wertheim1

  • 1TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

Ergonomics
|December 19, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Working in moving environments can impair performance through general factors like motion sickness and fatigue, or specific skill deficits. Cognitive tasks show no direct impact from motion.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The prevalence effect in lateral masking and its relevance for visual search.

Experimental brain research·2015
Same author

Visual conspicuity: a new simple standard, its reliability, validity and applicability.

Ergonomics·2010
Same author

Neural noise distorts perceived motion: the special case of the freezing illusion and the Pavard and Berthoz effect.

Experimental brain research·2007
Same author

How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

Maximal oxygen uptake during cycling is reduced in moving environments; consequences for motion-induced fatigue.

Ergonomics·2002
Same author

Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Perception·2001
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors
  • Environmental Psychology
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Environmental motion, whether simulated or real, is increasingly common in various work settings.
  • Understanding its impact on human performance is crucial for safety and productivity.
  • Existing research presents varied findings on the effects of motion on task execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize existing research and theories on how and why working in moving environments affects performance.
  • To differentiate between general and specific factors contributing to performance decrements.
  • To identify the types of human skills most susceptible to environmental motion.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scientific research and theoretical frameworks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of studies examining performance in simulated and real moving environments.
  • Categorization of performance effects into general and specific factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Performance decrements in moving environments can stem from general factors (reduced motivation, increased fatigue, balance issues) or specific skill impairments.
    • Specific effects are linked to biomechanical influences on perception (e.g., oculomotor control) and motor skills (e.g., manual tracking).
    • No direct impact of motion on purely cognitive tasks was found.

    Conclusions:

    • Environmental motion can negatively affect human performance through various mechanisms.
    • General factors like motion sickness and fatigue are significant, alongside specific biomechanical impacts on sensory and motor skills.
    • Cognitive functions appear resilient to direct interference from environmental motion.