Related Experiment Videos
Electrophysical factors influencing endoscopic sphincterotomy
R S Ratani1, T N Mills, C C Ainley
1Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|December 31, 1998
Summary
Electrosurgical waveform analysis reveals that while CUT, COAG, and BLEND waveforms require similar energy to initiate cutting, BLEND and COAG offer superior hemostasis compared to CUT. Optimizing electrosurgical cutting efficiency during procedures like sphincterotomy is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Surgical Technology
- Electrosurgery
Background:
- Analog computer techniques were employed to quantify electrosurgical power during sphincterotomy.
- Measurements were conducted in both experimental settings and clinical patient cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure electrosurgical power during sphincterotomy.
- To evaluate the impact of different waveforms (CUT, COAG, BLEND) on cutting efficiency and hemostasis.
- To identify factors influencing electrosurgical cutting performance.
Main Methods:
- Electrosurgical power, total energy, and transient power changes were measured during sphincterotomy in pigs and human post-mortem samples.
- The influence of waveform on hemostasis was assessed using canine mesenteric arteries.
- Factors such as wire contact length, power settings, force, and wire diameter were manipulated and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Cutting efficiency increased linearly with power, and halving wire contact length reduced the energy needed to initiate cutting.
- The CUT waveform was less effective at lower power settings compared to BLEND, while COAG required higher power for cutting initiation.
- BLEND demonstrated better hemostasis than CUT, and COAG provided superior hemostasis but poorer cutting performance.
Conclusions:
- Shortening wire contact length aids cutting initiation at suboptimal settings; increasing power may be necessary if cutting fails.
- BLEND waveform offers improved hemostasis over CUT, while COAG provides the best hemostasis at the expense of cutting efficacy.
- Clinical sphincterotomy cutting efficiency is suboptimal and presents opportunities for improvement through optimized electrosurgical techniques.