Proliferating principles; or how to sup with the devil without getting eaten

Area of Science:

• Humanitarian Studies
• International Relations
• Human Rights Law

Background:

• The international humanitarian system is perceived to be in crisis.
• Complex factors contribute, including reduced state investment in humanitarian principles.
• Concerns exist that humanitarian action may overlook human rights and inadvertently prolong conflicts.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the perceived crisis within the international humanitarian system.
• To examine the factors contributing to this crisis, particularly state ambivalence and the impact of humanitarian action on human rights and conflict duration.
• To understand the recent proliferation of statements and initiatives focused on humanitarian principles.

Main Methods:

• Qualitative analysis of existing literature and policy documents.
• Review of recent statements and initiatives concerning humanitarian principles.
• Synthesis of expert perceptions on the state of humanitarianism.

Main Results:

• Growing ambivalence from powerful states regarding investment in humanitarian principles.
• Significant concerns that humanitarian efforts neglect human rights and can extend conflicts.
• A notable increase in declarations and projects addressing humanitarian principles.

Conclusions:

• The international humanitarian system is experiencing a crisis of confidence and effectiveness.
• Addressing state commitment and the human rights implications of aid is crucial.
• The focus on humanitarian principles reflects a critical juncture for global aid efforts.