Related Experiment Videos
Azelastine reduces mediators of inflammation in patients with nasal polyps
Abstract:
Nasal polyps affect approximately 4% of the population in the western world. The etiology of this disease is unknown, although inflammatory mechanisms may play an important role. In preceding studies we and others have shown that besides H1-antagonism, azelastine influences the immigration and activation of inflammatory cells. In this open label study in 16 patients with nasal polyps and perennial mite-allergic rhinitis, the effect of azelastine nasal spray twice daily 0.14 mg to each nostril on recurrence of nasal polyposis after endonasal surgery was evaluated. One patient dropped out after 3 months, unwilling to take further medication. Clinical and laboratory data of 15 patients were recorded over 25 weeks in a total of seven visits. Of these one patient needed nasal budesonide during the 4 weeks between visits 3 and 4. All other patients did not take any steroids before inclusion into the trial or during the 6-month observation period. Concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) for eosinophils, myeloperoxidase (MPO) for neutrophils and tryptase for mast cells were determined in nasal secretions before and after eight and 25 weeks of treatment using double antibody radioimmunoassays, because these have been demonstrated to be good inflammatory markers in nasal diseases. Mean concentrations of MPO decreased from 2724 ng/mL to 1610 ng/mL (p = 0.0015) over the entire treatment period. ECP decreased from 458 ng/mL to 264 ng/mL (p = 0.0342). Tryptase decreased from 37.9 ng/mL to 22.4 ng/mL (p = 0.0574). These data were consistent with a significant decrease in clinical symptoms. Thus, azelastine seems to have an inhibitory effect on eosinophil and neutrophil activation in patients with nasal polyps and mite allergy.
Insights
Azelastine nasal spray reduced inflammatory markers and symptoms in patients with nasal polyps and mite allergy. This treatment appears to inhibit eosinophil and neutrophil activation, aiding post-surgery recovery.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Otolaryngology
- Allergology
Background:
- Nasal polyps affect 4% of the population, with unknown etiology but likely inflammatory mechanisms.
- Azelastine is known to influence inflammatory cell activity beyond H1-antagonism.
- Recurrence of nasal polyposis post-surgery is a clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of azelastine nasal spray on nasal polyp recurrence after endonasal surgery.
- To assess azelastine's impact on inflammatory cell markers in patients with nasal polyps and mite allergy.
Main Methods:
- Open-label study involving 15 patients with nasal polyps and mite-allergic rhinitis.
- Treatment with azelastine nasal spray (0.14 mg per nostril, twice daily) for 25 weeks post-surgery.
- Measurement of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and tryptase in nasal secretions at baseline and follow-up visits.
Main Results:
- Significant decrease in MPO (neutrophil marker) from 2724 ng/mL to 1610 ng/mL (p=0.0015).
- Significant decrease in ECP (eosinophil marker) from 458 ng/mL to 264 ng/mL (p=0.0342).
- A trend towards decreased tryptase (mast cell marker) from 37.9 ng/mL to 22.4 ng/mL (p=0.0574).
- Results correlated with a significant reduction in clinical symptoms.
Conclusions:
- Azelastine nasal spray demonstrated an inhibitory effect on eosinophil and neutrophil activation in patients with nasal polyps and mite allergy.
- The findings suggest azelastine may be beneficial in managing nasal polyposis post-surgery, potentially reducing recurrence by controlling inflammation.