Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit

J Y Kan1, K Rungcharassaeng, K Bohsali

  • 1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|January 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Research progress in the application of artificial intelligence on evaluating the electrocardiogram].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2021
Same author

Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2002
Same author

Site development for anterior single implant esthetics: the dentulous site.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·2002
Same author

Predictable peri-implant gingival aesthetics: surgical and prosthodontic rationales.

Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD·2002
Same author

Removable ovate pontic for peri-implant architecture preservation during immediate implant placement.

Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD·2002
Same author

Maintaining and attenuating periodontal tissues for aesthetic implant placement.

The Journal of oral implantology·2002
Same journal

Risk factors in peri-implantitis: A narrative review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Vat photopolymerization-printed zirconia veneered with porcelain: Mechanical properties, fatigue properties, and fractographic analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Marginal and internal fit of zirconia CAD-CAM fabricated with conventional impression and digital scanning techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Clinical outcomes of immediate versus early or conventional loading of single implants: A de novo RCT-level meta-analysis with contextual synthesis of systematic reviews.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Assessment of selective laser-melted removable partial denture frameworks compared with conventionally cast frameworks: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Evidence-based evaluation of large language models in advanced clinical decision-making for removable prosthodontics.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Achieving passive fit for implant-supported prostheses is crucial for osseointegration, but clear guidelines are lacking. This review examines clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit, recommending a combined approach to minimize misfit.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Passive fit of implant-supported prosthesis frameworks is considered essential for successful long-term osseointegration.
  • Current scientific literature lacks defined guidelines for achieving and measuring passive fit.
  • The absence of standardized protocols hinders consistent clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and discuss the concept of passive fit in implant prosthodontics.
  • To review and analyze existing clinical methodologies for evaluating implant framework fit.
  • To provide insights into the challenges and current state of passive fit assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of the dental literature.
  • Identification and categorization of clinical techniques used for evaluating implant framework fit.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the strengths and limitations of each method.

    • Main Results:

    • Various clinical methods for assessing implant framework fit have been reported.
    • No single method provides universally objective and definitive results for passive fit.
    • Existing techniques offer varying degrees of insight into prosthesis-implant interface discrepancies.

    Conclusions:

    • The criteria for acceptable passive fit are currently empirical rather than evidence-based.
    • A combination of available clinical evaluation methods is recommended to mitigate the impact of framework misfits.
    • Further research is needed to establish objective and reliable methods for assessing passive fit.