Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical spine models for biomechanical research

M M Panjabi1

  • 1Biomechanics Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. manohar.panjabi@yale.edu

Spine
|January 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomechanical stability of five pedicle screw fixation systems in a human lumbar spine instability model.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part I: Theory.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part II: Experiment.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Role of tectorial membrane in the stability of the upper cervical spine.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Viscoelasticity of the alar and transverse ligaments.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2010
Same author

Injury of the anterior longitudinal ligament during whiplash simulation.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2003

Biomechanical models aid in understanding cervical spine function and testing devices. Four types exist: physical, in vitro, in vivo animal, and computer models, each with unique applications and limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanical Engineering
  • Spinal Biomechanics
  • Medical Device Development

Background:

  • Biomechanical models are crucial for understanding normal and dysfunctional cervical spine mechanics.
  • These models are essential for evaluating the efficacy and safety of spinal implants and devices.
  • A comprehensive understanding of different model types is necessary for accurate research outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To categorize and delineate the characteristics of various biomechanical models used in spinal research.
  • To highlight the advantages and limitations of each model type for specific research questions.
  • To emphasize the importance of appropriate model selection and validation in biomechanical studies.

Main Methods:

  • Categorization of biomechanical models into four main groups: physical, in vitro, in vivo animal, and computer models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of the typical applications and materials used for each model type.
  • Discussion of the suitability of human versus animal specimens for in vitro models.

    • Main Results:

    • Physical models are suitable for evaluating spinal instrumentation in isolation.
    • In vitro cadaveric models provide insights into spine function, with human specimens preferred for anatomical and kinematic fidelity.
    • In vivo animal models allow for the study of dynamic biological processes like fusion and degeneration, while computer models offer solutions for complex problems but require rigorous validation.

    Conclusions:

    • Each biomechanical model type (physical, in vitro, in vivo, computer) serves distinct purposes in cervical spine research and device testing.
    • The selection of an appropriate model, considering its inherent assumptions and limitations, is critical for the validity of research findings.
    • Proper validation, comparing model predictions with experimental data, is essential for the reliability of computer-based biomechanical models.