Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy]

C Ritter1, M Sahm, G Kubo

  • 1Chirurgische Klinik, DRK-Kliniken Berlin-Köpenick.

Zentralblatt Fur Chirurgie
|January 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure Property Relationships of the Exotic Insulator-Insulator Transition in CeMnAsO<sub>1-<i>x</i></sub> F <sub><i>x</i></sub> : A Potential Excitonic Insulator.

Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Exploring veterinary knowledge extension methods and perceived barriers among Canadian dairy veterinarians and producers: A qualitative focus group study.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Dairy veterinarians' perceptions of barriers to uptake of continuing education programs: A focus group study.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Dairy farmers' perception of barriers associated with the uptake of educational programs: A qualitative focus group study in Ontario, Canada.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Perceived barriers of dairy producers to the adoption of selective antimicrobial therapies for nonsevere clinical mastitis and at dry-off in dairy cattle: A focus group study in Ontario, Canada.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Dairy producers' awareness, perceptions, and barriers to early detection and treatment of lameness on dairy farms: A qualitative focus group study.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same journal

[Treatment of Vocal Fold Paralysis].

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
Same journal

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
Same journal

Predictive Factors for Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, as Detected by Video-assisted Mediastinoscopic Lymphadenectomy.

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
Same journal

[Robotic Management of a Bile Leak After Cholecystectomy Caused by an Aberrant Bile Duct of the Hepatic Segments, Using a Combined Biliodigestive Anastomosis Incorporating the Cystic Duct Stump].

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
Same journal

[Microvascular Reconstruction of the Laryngotracheal Junction].

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
Same journal

[Evaluation of Multimodal Perioperative Care Pathway Supported by a Patient-facing Mobile App in Colorectal Surgery - First Clinical Experience and Patient Satisfaction].

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers excellent visualization and fewer wound infections compared to conventional methods. While initial abscess rates were higher, improved techniques reduced this risk, making it a viable surgical option.

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • The study prospectively observed 857 appendectomies between January 1995 and August 1997.
  • The clinic increasingly adopted laparoscopic appendectomies, developing a dedicated surgical team.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy with the conventional technique.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy in a clinical setting.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study design observing 857 appendectomies.
  • Standardized preparation using bipolaric instruments, scissors, and Röder-sling for the appendix stump.
  • Use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) instruments, with Endo-GIA reserved for specific cases.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy provides superior intra-abdominal visualization, aiding in the detection of additional findings and precise therapeutic planning.
  • Operating times were comparable between methods (conventional: 35.3 min, laparoscopic: 43.8 min), with convergence expected upon surgeon proficiency.
  • Laparoscopic approach showed significantly fewer wound infections but a higher initial rate of intra-abdominal abscesses (1.9% vs. 0.2%), which was reduced through improved lavage and drainage techniques.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure with no absolute contraindications.
  • The technique offers benefits, particularly for obese or muscular patients, due to enhanced visualization and reduced wound complications.
  • Conventional appendectomy remains a reliable technique, essential for future surgical practice.