Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes

J L Barbur1, J Wolf, P Lennie

  • 1Applied Vision Research Centre, City University, London, UK. johnb@city.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|January 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Colour vision requirements in visually demanding occupations.

British medical bulletin·2017
Same author

The Macular Assessment Profile test - a new VDU-based technique for measuring the spatial distribution of the macular pigment, lens density and rapid flicker sensitivity.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2010
Same author

Colour detection thresholds as a function of chromatic adaptation and light level.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2010
Same author

Loss of chromatic sensitivity in AMD and diabetes: a comparative study.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2010
Same author

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity.

Visual neuroscience·2008
Same author

A study of unusual Rayleigh matches in deutan deficiency.

Visual neuroscience·2008
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Visual stimulus changes trigger pupil responses and reaction times, revealing distinct processing levels in the brain. Pupil responses to color or structure changes are slower than light flux changes, suggesting different visual pathway mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Visual processing involves analyzing attributes like color, structure, and motion.
  • Pupil constriction is a measurable response to visual stimuli, potentially linked to cortical mechanisms.
  • Reaction times to visual stimuli provide insights into the speed of perceptual and cognitive processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether different visual attributes are processed at the same or different levels in the visual pathway.
  • To compare the timing of pupil responses and manual reaction times to various visual stimulus changes.
  • To determine the neural correlates of visual attribute processing based on latency measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Measuring transient pupil constriction in response to changes in stimulus attributes (color, structure, movement, light flux).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measuring manual reaction times to the same visual stimulus changes.
  • Analyzing the latencies of both pupil responses and reaction times to infer processing levels.

    • Main Results:

    • Pupil responses to spatial structure or color changes were nearly identical and 40 ms slower than responses to light flux changes.
    • Manual reaction times varied: light flux (184 ms), grating onset (190 ms), color change (214 ms), coherent motion onset (221 ms).
    • Latency patterns suggest distinct cortical processing levels for different visual attributes, with motion processing being surprisingly slow.

    Conclusions:

    • Pupil responses and reaction times indicate that different visual attributes are processed at different levels within the visual cortex.
    • The findings support the hypothesis that decisions regarding grating onset occur in V1, while color and motion changes are processed in V4.
    • Latency analysis provides a valuable tool for mapping visual attribute processing onto specific neural pathways.