Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2026

Method of Direct Segmental Intra-hepatic Delivery Using a Rat Liver Hilar Clamp Model
Published on: April 2, 2017
Modulation of phase II enzymes by organosulfur compounds from allium vegetables in rat tissues
D Guyonnet1, M H Siess, A M Le Bon
1Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Toxicologie Nutritionnelle, BV 1540, 17 rue Sully, Dijon Cedex, 21034, France.
Abstract:
The naturally occurring organosulfur compounds (OSCs) diallyl sulfide (DAS), diallyl disulfide (DADS), dipropyl sulfide (DPS), and dipropyl disulfide (DPDS) were studied with respect to their effects on hepatic, intestinal, renal, and pulmonary phase II drug metabolizing enzymes, i.e., glutathione S-transferase (GST), microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), quinone reductase (QR), and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT). OSCs were administered po to male SPF Wistar rats. In addition to assays of total enzyme activity, the ability of OSCs to modify the levels of mEH and rGSTA1/A2, A3/A5, M1, M2, and P1 was assessed by Western blotting. Remarkably, DADS significantly increased all Phase II enzyme activities, except the pulmonary mEH. It was noteworthy that only DADS induced QR activity. DAS, DPS, and DPDS induced mEH, GST, and UGT activities in the liver. Interestingly, DAS, DPS, and DPDS significantly decreased renal GST activity. In the same manner, DAS, DPS, and DPDS decreased rGSTA1/A2 and A3/A5 levels in the kidney. Conversely, all OSCs were able to induce GST of alpha and mu classes in the liver. In the intestine, DADS and DAS increased rGSTA1/A2, M2, and P1, while rGSTA3/A5 and M2 were only increased by DADS. In addition, DADS induced rGSTP1 dramatically in the four tissues analyzed. DADS also increased the mEH levels in the liver, intestine, and kidney, while DAS and DPS moderately induced mEH level in the liver. This study brings additional insights into the effects of OSCs on Phase II enzymes and suggests that DADS could be a promising chemopreventive agent considering its pleiotropic capacity of induction.
More Related Videos
10:44Mass Spectrometry and Luminogenic-based Approaches to Characterize Phase I Metabolic Competency of In Vitro Cell Cultures
Published on: March 28, 2017
09:33Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling
Published on: March 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Phase II Reactions: Glucuronidation
Phase II Reactions: Sulfation and Conjugation with α-Amino Acids
Phase II Reactions: Glutathione Conjugation and Mercapturic Acid Formation
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish glutathione conjugation from other phase II...
Phase II Reactions: Methylation Reactions
The mechanism of methylation unfolds in two stages. The first stage sees a methyltransferase enzyme facilitating the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, forming S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The second stage involves further metabolism of SAH into homocysteine, which can be recycled...
Phase II Reactions: Miscellaneous Conjugation Reactions
A key example involves the conjugation of cyanide ions, which impair cellular respiration and alter hemoglobin into non-oxygen-carrying cyanmethemoglobin. To neutralize this threat, a sulfur atom from thiosulphate is transferred to the cyanide ion, catalyzed by the enzyme rhodanese, resulting in an inactive compound called thiocyanate. The production of...
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase