Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based practice: the arguments for and against

J Parkin1

  • 1Intensive Care/Coronary Care, North Devon District Hospital, Raleigh Park, Barnstaple.

Nursing in Critical Care
|January 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subcutaneous Administration of Otelixizumab is Limited by Injection Site Reactions: Results of an Exploratory Study in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association·2016
Same author

Urinary C-peptide analysis in an intervention study: experience from the DEFEND-2 otelixizumab trial.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2016
Same author

Efficacy and safety of low-dose otelixizumab anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in preserving C-peptide secretion in adolescent type 1 diabetes: DEFEND-2, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2013
Same author

Asthma control in a random sample of New Zealand adolescent asthmatics.

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma·2007
Same author

Genotyping demonstrates that the strains of Proteus mirabilis from bladder stones and catheter encrustations of patients undergoing long-term bladder catheterization are identical.

The Journal of urology·2004
Same author

Developing alternative devices to the long-term urinary catheter for draining urine from the bladder.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine·2003
Same journal

Response to Yu et al.'s Commentary on Effectiveness of Oral Care Intervention and Safe Swallowing Education on Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Patients: A Nurse-Led Quasi-Experimental Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Designing Nurse-Physician Collaboration to Improve Psychological Safety, Satisfaction and Commitment of Critical Care Nurses-A Multi-Informant Survey Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Development of Entrustable Professional Activities for Adult Intensive Care.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Commentary About: Effectiveness of Oral Care Intervention and Safe Swallowing Education on Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Patients: A Nurse-Led Quasi-Experimental Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

The Lived Experience of Adult Patients on Mechanical Ventilation: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Case Series: Episodes of Care in an Intensive Care Garden-Does Fresh Air Matter?

Nursing in critical care·2026
See all related articles

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is growing in healthcare due to quality and economic demands. This article explores the supporting and opposing arguments for EBP and its implications for patients and professionals.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • The increasing adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare is driven by the pursuit of quality improvement.
  • Economic pressures necessitate more efficient resource allocation within the healthcare sector, further promoting EBP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a balanced overview of the arguments supporting and opposing evidence-based practice.
  • To analyze the implications of evidence-based practice for both patients and healthcare professionals.

Main Methods:

  • A review of existing literature and expert opinion on evidence-based practice.
  • Analysis of arguments for and against the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Arguments for EBP often center on improved patient outcomes and resource efficiency.
  • Arguments against EBP may highlight challenges in implementation, potential for deskilling, and the complexity of integrating research into diverse clinical settings.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence-based practice presents both significant benefits and challenges that require careful consideration.
  • Understanding the multifaceted implications of EBP is crucial for successful integration into healthcare systems, benefiting both patients and providers.