Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sexual harassment: identifying risk factors

E A O'Hare1, W O'Donohue

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb 60115, USA.

Archives of Sexual Behavior
|January 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Narrowing the wingless-2 mutation to a 227 kb candidate region on chicken chromosome 12.

Poultry science·2018
Same author

Sexual harassment.

Annual review of sex research·2001
Same author

Are we ready for this classification system?

Journal of sex & marital therapy·2001
Same author

Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia.

Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment·2000
Same author

Characteristics of empirically supported treatments.

The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2000
Same author

What is a delusion? Epistemological dimensions.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1999
Same journal

The Hurlbert Index of Sexual Desire-Short Form: Psychometric Properties.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Attitudes of Victim-Blame Toward Image-Based Sexual Abuse Victim-Survivors in Fiji: Understanding Gendered and Cultural Norms.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Sociopolitical Drivers of Health Disparities in LGBTQ+ Communities within the United States: Historical Context and Contemporary Policy.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Active, Passive, and Non-Sexting Adolescents: Testing Deviancy and Normalcy Perspectives Across Risk-Related and Sexual Competence Variables.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Perceived Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Attractiveness, Age, and Parity Judgments in Pre-Contemporary European Portraits of Clothed Women.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Nulliparous Women's Self-Objectification, Fear of Childbirth, and Fertility Intentions: A Mediational Model.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
See all related articles

A new four-factor model better predicts sexual harassment than other models. Key risk factors include unprofessional workplaces, sexist atmospheres, and lack of knowledge about grievance procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Sexual harassment is a complex issue with various proposed etiological models.
  • Existing models include biological, organizational, sociocultural, and sex role spillover perspectives.
  • A comprehensive understanding of risk factors is crucial for prevention and intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a new four-factor model for understanding the etiology of sexual harassment.
  • To compare the predictive power of the four-factor model against existing models.
  • To identify specific workplace and personal risk factors associated with sexual harassment.

Main Methods:

  • A quantitative study involving 266 female university faculty, staff, and students.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized the Sexual Experience Questionnaire to assess sexual harassment.
  • Administered a questionnaire to measure various risk factors, including environmental and personal characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed four-factor model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to alternative models.
    • Key predictors of sexual harassment were identified as an unprofessional work environment, a sexist atmosphere, and insufficient knowledge of formal grievance procedures.
    • Specific environmental and personal characteristics were found to be associated with increased risk.

    Conclusions:

    • The four-factor model provides a robust framework for understanding sexual harassment.
    • Workplace environment characteristics, particularly unprofessionalism and sexism, are significant contributors to sexual harassment.
    • Improving awareness and accessibility of grievance procedures may help mitigate sexual harassment incidents.