Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality management in midwifery practice

C Collins-Fulea1, J Kriebs, B A Petersen

  • 1Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

Seminars for Nurse Managers
|January 15, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Magnetic Monopole Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.36  TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.

Physical review letters·2025

This study explains quality management in midwifery, detailing how peer review, quality improvement, and quality assurance work together. It provides examples of indicators and thresholds for effective midwifery care.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Midwifery Practice
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Effective quality management is crucial for safe and effective midwifery care.
  • Understanding the interplay between different quality initiatives is essential for healthcare professionals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of quality management in midwifery practice.
  • To demonstrate the interaction between peer review, quality improvement, and quality assurance in midwifery.
  • To illustrate the application of indicators, thresholds, and benchmarking within midwifery quality management.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of quality management principles.
  • Conceptual demonstration of the integration of peer review, quality improvement, and quality assurance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presentation of examples for indicators, thresholds, and benchmarking.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality management in midwifery involves a synergistic relationship between peer review, quality improvement, and quality assurance.
    • Specific examples of measurable indicators and performance thresholds can guide quality initiatives.
    • Benchmarking provides a comparative framework for assessing and enhancing midwifery practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrating peer review, quality improvement, and quality assurance enhances overall midwifery care quality.
    • The use of defined indicators, thresholds, and benchmarking is vital for systematic quality management in midwifery.
    • This framework supports the continuous advancement of midwifery practice standards and patient outcomes.